Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: cogitator
OK....

The classic theory holds that there is a (single, stationary) hot spot under the slowly-moving central Pacific plate, and that the much more heavily-weathered (eroded) Hawaiian Islands towards Midway are the oldest and “coldest” and shortest.

Makes sense. But, if there is only one hot-spot, why is there a new island growing to the southeast of the Big Island (still underwater now) if the main volcanoes on the big island are still active?

10 posted on 07/09/2007 2:08:49 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Robert A. Cook, PE
But, if there is only one hot-spot, why is there a new island growing to the southeast of the Big Island (still underwater now) if the main volcanoes on the big island are still active?

It would appear that the hot-spot "source" can support multiple vents. Hualalai was recently active (1801), and Haleakala's (Maui) last eruption was in 1790. Mauna Loa is obviously still active -- this has been a relatively long hiatus for it.

Given that record, it's hard to even count Mauna Kea as extinct. Far be it for me to figure out the plumbing under the islands.

11 posted on 07/09/2007 2:59:10 PM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson