Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Eaker; DieHard the Hunter
Right now I share my home with a Chinese Pug and a Papillon. In the last 20 years I've owned 2 Cocker Spaniels, a Golden Retriever, a German Shepherd/Malamute mix, an American Bulldog, and an American Bull Terrier.

And that's just a short list of the canine companions I've had. If I toss in the various breeds of cats, rabbits, birds, lizards, and arachnids I've kept I guess most folks would think my appearance must be a combination of Lon Cheney, Peter Lorre, and Marty Feldman.

But I ain't quite that pretty....

There are no dangerous breeds of dogs. There are only dangerous breeds of people.

L

23 posted on 09/30/2007 12:21:24 AM PDT by Lurker ( Comparing moderate islam to extremist islam is like comparing smallpox to ebola.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Lurker

> There are no dangerous breeds of dogs. There are only dangerous breeds of people.

I guess I could *almost* agree with that: I would say that there are definitely individual dogs that have been bred to be dangerous, and then have been “trained” to have these genetic traits brought to the forefront.

And that these dogs tend to be labeled as “Pit Bulls” — when in fact they are not bred to any particular breed standard at all: just a mungrel muttly collection of bad genetics, where you could find a fair ol’ mix of any DNA you went looking for in the deepest cesspits of the canine gene pool. Where a responsible breeder would cull such misfits from the litter, there are mungrel breeders who will actually emphasize the undesirable traits, ultimately breeding, thru enough generations, a dog that is untrainable and probably psychotic and sociopathic.

I don’t think any sentient human being could possibly disagree with that observation.

Such dogs have very little opportunity or scope for adjusting to “normal” pack behaviors, and the kindest thing to do for these mungrel mutts is to euthanize humanely. This, naturally, can be easier said than done...

I have suggested (in jest) a flame-thrower: on reflection I guess I’m only half-kidding. Some of these dogs would be too jolly dangerous to approach with a needle. A firearm may not kill humanely, or on first-shot — so now, instead of having a merely-dangerous-and-psychotic dog to cope with, you have a wounded one as well, who is now very, very angry and very motivated to inflict injury in like manner, with a very hi pain thresh-hold and a drive to fight to its last breath (this is what it has, after all, been bred to do) despite horrific injuries...

Yes, dangerous, bad people make these dogs what they are. Generally, the fault lies with people.


25 posted on 09/30/2007 3:12:52 AM PDT by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson