Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: samtheman
I know the authorities did what they had to do when they killed the tiger, and I know the zoo was probably at fault for having a confinement setup that was less than adequate.

That is so true...no matter what wrongs those stupid, drunk kids did, the confinement for the tiger/s should have been adequate enough to keep any one of them from escaping. That is where the fault of the zoo will come into play, rather than the fault of the kids. The families of these kids will sue, and they will get away with what caused the killing of their friend, and of the tiger. I hope their conscience will drive them nuts the rest of their lives because they are ultimately responsible for the deaths.

20 posted on 01/05/2008 5:27:04 AM PST by CitizenM ("An excuse is worse than an lie, because an excuse is a lie hidden." Pope John Paul, II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: CitizenM

There was an independent review done in 1999 - the chron referenced it in an earlier article - http://www.sfgov.org/site/uploadedfiles/budanalyst/zoo/1_1animalmanagement.pdf I have not seen any documented facts - in either this report or mtg minutes, that any agency or individual ever pointed out a deficiency in the tiger exhibit - so I can’t yet feel compelled to point a “you should have known” finger at the SF zoo...just my humble opinion of course...


21 posted on 01/05/2008 5:31:44 AM PST by repinwi (Don't squat with your spurs on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson