Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ShadowAce

Making money.

From the standpoint of a public-traded corporation, the GPL has nothing but liabilities.

The BSD license limits those liabilities.


16 posted on 08/12/2008 6:54:39 AM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: NVDave
From the standpoint of a public-traded corporation, the GPL has nothing but liabilities.

As I said--it depends on the purpose of the software. If you're gonna sell your product and that product uses GPL software, then yes--it would be a liability. BSD would be a better choice.

If, however, you are using it in-house, and would like "free" development, and think the software would be useful to others, then the GPL would be good, because any development that others do would get back to you.

Again--it depends on the situation.

19 posted on 08/12/2008 6:59:47 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson