Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: LiteKeeper
No, they aren’t. Especially when they are allowed to set the rules for what is and what isn’t “science.”

So who else but scientists should set the rules of how science is conducted?

I can't believe you are serious about wanting anti-science fundamentalists to have a say in how something they hate is conducted. Analogies would be criminals helping run the police departments and arsonists telling firefighters how to do their jobs.

12 posted on 10/24/2008 9:47:27 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Coyoteman
Christians and creationists are not the least bit anti-science. Most of the scientific disciplines were founded by theists/deists.

What you fail to see is the difference between "operational science" [that which is leading to technological advances today], and "origins science" [which describes the origin of the universe, and life]. Evolution has nothing to do with the former, and everything to do with the latter...and in the latter, your conclusions are based upon assumptions of things that you can neither prove, nor disprove.

13 posted on 10/24/2008 11:03:58 PM PDT by LiteKeeper (Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson