Posted on 04/30/2009 5:52:52 PM PDT by jazusamo
Tala and Nakai are sister and brother, 5½ weeks old and adorable.
The wolf pups from the Colorado Wolf and Wildlife Center in Divide made their first public appearance Thursday, starring in a wildlife exhibition at The Broadmoor, but Darlene Kobobel, their caretaker, is worried this will be an ugly spring for the pups' wild-born brethren.
After years of debate, court cases and bureaucratic wrangling, on May 4 the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is due to remove gray wolves from the endangered and threatened species list in Idaho, Montana and parts of Utah, Oregon and Washington. Wolves will remain protected in Wyoming.
Kobobel is using her furry ambassadors to speak out against the delisting, and urges visitors to the center to write or call U.S. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar to protest the decision.
"As a wolf and wildlife center, I felt I couldn't stand back and not do anything," Kobobel said. "I'm hoping these babies can help be a voice."
Kobobel said the delisting could lead to immediate government-sponsored hunts and culls, at least in some of the states. This time of year, she said, killing the adults would leave pups like Tala and Nakai to starve in their dens.
"It will literally be a blood bath," she said. "I'm not saying never kill a wolf, ever. I'm saying, there are better ways to do it."
From the government's standpoint, however, removing wolves from the list is a success story - the culmination of years of careful, and highly controversial, reintroduction. More than 1,600 wolves now roam the northern Rocky Mountains. That's far above the 300-wolf minimum goal established by the recovery plan adopted in 1987, a mark that was achieved in 2001. In states where they will be delisted, wolf management plans aim to maintain a stable population size, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
In Montana, for instance, that state's fish, wildlife and parks department said in a news release that it wants a stable population of 400 or more wolves, compared with a current population of about 500. Idaho has a population of about 850 wolves currently, with a target range of 500 to 700.
Even with wolves coming off the protected list, there won't be a full-fledged hunt - not yet, anyway. Montana and Idaho both plan to hold wolf-hunting seasons in the fall, although quotas haven't been set yet.
The management plans, particularly Idaho's, aren't thorough enough to satisfy conservation groups, who plan to file a lawsuit and seek an injunction, said a spokesman for the group Defenders of Wildlife. A similar injunction last year successfully postponed the delisting until this May. The case won't go to court until June 4, so there will be at least several weeks where the wild wolves will be unprotected.
Tala and Nakai are cute but unintended results of an accidental pregnancy of Koda, one of the wolf center's females, Kobobel said, who was supposed to be too young to breed. The center tries not to add to the state's captive wolf population, Kobobel said, but now that they're here, the pups will spend their lives at the center.
And maybe they'll change a few minds along the way.
A rancher loses 23 lambs, the first documented wolf attack since 1999
Wolf lover Ping!
This is the same bloodbath that has engulfed our nation because of more concealed carry permits, right?
Good point, it’s about the same mentality.
Any chance we can relocate a few (thousand) wolves to someplace, say, like, San Francisco? They could ravage all they want there, and hey, you wouldn’t hear me complain.
Anyone who eats should support farmers and ranchers.
That sounds like a great idea to me. Those AR activists would find out just how warm and cuddly wolves are. :)
Glad you saw this bhf, should have pinged you.
Sorry lady but if any animal is trying to kill livestock of mine or my domesticated animals I think I have the right to shoot it!
What did he lose, really...$1,000?
I am so keeping out of this one : )
That's in the article.
This is a dead bang case because they've got pics of the wolves, that very seldom takes place and the govt and these groups that say they pay want absolute proof.
Wolves and ranching don't mix, that's why they were exterminated years ago. In packs they're a fine tuned killing machines.
:-)
Nice pics, Shyla.
I love wolves (had one) but they kill for the sheer hell of it.
Kinda like an unrefined catch & release that we humans do but they forget to release.
Not counting nearby chickens, ducks, peacocks, etc., my wolf killed my neighbors’ turtles in their waterfall, then presented them to the neighbors, as if it were the best favor ever conferred... as in ‘Look! I fixed your turtle problem!’
That’s correct. The AR activists put forth that wolves don’t kill for the fun of it and they only kill the old, sick and weak, no truth to that at all.
The numbers of wolves in the Rocky Mtn states are already way above the numbers the enviros were calling for but once a species is listed the enviros don’t want it to ever be delisted.
Anyone who believes that is stupid.
“The AR activists put forth that wolves don’t kill for the fun of it and they only kill the old, sick and weak, no truth to that at all.”
Actually, it is true. When the wolf pack singles you out, that’s as old as you will get. After they bite you several times, you feel sick. And once they unzip your guts and start eating, you feel weak.
Yup, it sounds a tad high to me too.
Sounds like that’s his starting price but he’ll be willing to go lower. :)
Heh Heh,
Can’t argue with that and part of you is eaten before you’re dead.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.