Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: Fred Nerks
2 posted on
05/07/2009 4:35:37 PM PDT by
truthkeeper
(Take me back to Black-and-White.)
To: Beckwith; LucyT
3 posted on
05/07/2009 4:36:28 PM PDT by
Fred Nerks
(fair dinkum!)
To: Fred Nerks
What? No baptism? From this deeply Christian guy? What a shock....
To: Fred Nerks
BREAKING NEWS
"THIS JUST IN - The Obama administration has set up an education camp
for anyone asking any question about his credentials."
5 posted on
05/07/2009 4:39:43 PM PDT by
Diogenesis
(Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
To: Fred Nerks
This defeats the concept of checks and balances - the executive branch shouldn’t have the power to monitor itself. Could someone “with standing” challenge this?
7 posted on
05/07/2009 4:40:51 PM PDT by
ElayneJ
To: Fred Nerks
trans·par·ent (trns-pârnt, -pr-) adj. 4.
a. Easily seen through or detected; obvious: transparent lies.b. Free from guile; candid or open: transparent sincerity.
He has dictionary issues too.
8 posted on
05/07/2009 4:41:32 PM PDT by
A message
(3 years 8 months 13 days)
To: Fred Nerks
Fraud, and violation of Constitutional law, upon the American people, is a basis for impeachment and trial of a sitting president. And he wants to charge attorneys for waterboarding? Let the games begin.
9 posted on
05/07/2009 4:42:41 PM PDT by
EagleUSA
To: Fred Nerks
Since the COLB is not in the hands of the Archivist (it is allegedly in a vault in Hawaii) then it should be free game, right?
11 posted on
05/07/2009 4:44:38 PM PDT by
SERKIT
("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
To: Fred Nerks
A marxist quisling and the GOP roll over and play dead. Shameful
12 posted on
05/07/2009 4:45:11 PM PDT by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: Fred Nerks
SCOTUS could easily overrule this... but they obviously wont... because they apparently care no more for the constitution they swore to uphold than he does.
14 posted on
05/07/2009 4:45:48 PM PDT by
Safrguns
To: Fred Nerks
Go ahead, tell me that this is just a coincidence
He is a quisling. He's our very own Robert Mugabe.
15 posted on
05/07/2009 4:46:53 PM PDT by
aruanan
To: Fred Nerks
Unless I’m reading the EO wrong, there is a difference between PRESIDENTIAL records and PRIVATE records of PRESIDENTS.
Can someone elaborate?
16 posted on
05/07/2009 4:48:21 PM PDT by
autumnraine
(Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose- Kris Kristoferrson)
To: devolve; Fred Nerks; ntnychik; PhilDragoo; MeekOneGOP; Lady Jag; dixiechick2000; yorkie; ...
18 posted on
05/07/2009 4:53:07 PM PDT by
potlatch
To: LucyT
I am distrustful of Obama too, but I really think this EO deals with PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS.
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the
laws of the United States of America, and in order to establish policies
and procedures governing the assertion of executive privilege by incumbent
and former Presidents in connection with the release of Presidential records
by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) pursuant
to the Presidential Records Act of 1978,
20 posted on
05/07/2009 4:55:20 PM PDT by
autumnraine
(Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose- Kris Kristoferrson)
To: Fred Nerks
CHILLING.
A crypto-stalinist sits in the Oval Office
27 posted on
05/07/2009 5:12:52 PM PDT by
ZULU
(God guts and guns made America great. Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam.)
To: Fred Nerks
28 posted on
05/07/2009 5:14:04 PM PDT by
Chode
(American Hedonist - Obama is basically Jim Jones with a teleprompter)
To: Fred Nerks
Well, sorry. Doesn’t mean we can’t wonder and doubt, does it?
34 posted on
05/07/2009 5:27:11 PM PDT by
goldi
To: Fred Nerks
Refresh my memory......how hard did the Lamestream media and leftists go after Bush for his Air National Guard records??
42 posted on
05/07/2009 5:42:28 PM PDT by
Electric Graffiti
(Yonder stands your orphan with his gun)
To: Fred Nerks
That's a load of Crap.The Public has a right to that information.What is Nobama trying to conceal?What other things is he hiding that the public really should know about?
65 posted on
05/07/2009 6:25:04 PM PDT by
puppypusher
(The world is going to the dogs.)
To: Fred Nerks
Ah Fred, so it seems that the battle with the CIA has begun.
They are not to leak his "records.." But this won't stop the spooks. Leaks are sure to come.
I don't knw how many times I have written this but one more: FASCIST MARKER
72 posted on
05/07/2009 7:07:55 PM PDT by
Candor7
(The weapons of choice against fascism are ,derision ,truth. (member NRA)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
