Yeah, but sub-prime numbers qualify for TARP funds.
1 posted on
05/10/2009 5:17:09 PM PDT by
decimon
To: decimon
Just goes to show that we can find GOD in the smallest of places.
2 posted on
05/10/2009 5:21:55 PM PDT by
TMSuchman
(I'll heat up & bring the tar, you bring the feathers & we'll meet in DC!)
To: decimon
3 posted on
05/10/2009 5:22:00 PM PDT by
CodeToad
(If it weren't for physics and law enforcement I'd be unstoppable!)
To: decimon
It would be wrong of me to describe something that I don’t understand as worthless, because what do I know? Well, at least this little study didn’t cost me anything. I hope.
To: decimon
Besides providing insight into the nature of primes, the finding could also have applications in areas such as fraud detection and stock market analysis. And also in cryptography, relating to Public Key Encryption. It might be that it wasn't unnoticed, but the notice was just in classified papers.
5 posted on
05/10/2009 5:25:00 PM PDT by
PapaBear3625
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money -- Thatcher)
To: decimon
This is hugh. I am series.
7 posted on
05/10/2009 5:27:59 PM PDT by
PackerBoy
(Just my opinion ....)
To: decimon
Actually, Al Gore made this discovery, but being the modest guy that he is, decided to let someone else get the credit.
To: decimon
“Since the late 70s, researchers have known that prime numbers themselves, when taken in very large data sets, are not distributed according to Benfords law. Instead, the first digit distribution of primes seems to be approximately uniform. However, as Luque and Lacasa point out, smaller data sets (intervals) of primes exhibit a clear bias in first digit distribution. The researchers noticed another pattern: the larger the data set of primes they analyzed, the more closely the first digit distribution approached uniformity. In light of this, the researchers wondered if there existed any pattern underlying the trend toward uniformity as the prime interval increases to infinity.”
You mean all the prime numbers between 900000 and 999999 all start with 9? I never would have guessed that! How much of my tax money was used to finance the discovery of this completely obvious result?
17 posted on
05/10/2009 5:52:33 PM PDT by
devere
To: decimon
I love this stuff.
Ever since I first trisected an angle with just a compass and a straightedge, I’ve loved this stuff.
To: SirKit
24 posted on
05/10/2009 6:10:22 PM PDT by
SuziQ
To: decimon
They found that the distribution of the leading digit in the prime number sequence can be described by a generalization of Benfords law.
I've been saying that for years but nobody listened to me.........
29 posted on
05/10/2009 6:21:46 PM PDT by
Hot Tabasco
(This country isn't going to hell in a handbasket, it's riding shotgun in an Indy car....)
To: decimon
This entire article is a series of mere tautologies!
What a gyp!
32 posted on
05/10/2009 6:35:14 PM PDT by
headsonpikes
(Genocide is the highest sacrament of socialism.)
To: decimon; Perdogg; AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; KevinDavis; ..
the distribution of the leading digit in the prime number sequence can be described by a generalization of Benford's law. In addition, this same pattern also appears in another number sequence, that of the leading digits of nontrivial Riemann zeta zeros, which is known to be related to the distribution of primes. Besides providing insight into the nature of primes, the finding could also have applications in areas such as fraud detection and stock market analysis.
"I learned this in college thirty years ago" in 3, 2, 1... ;')
Thanks decimon. Looks like I'd better dust my collection of nontrivial Riemann zeta zeros, in case all the freakin' mathmeticians show up. Perdogg, note that last sentence in the excerpt.
· Google ·
34 posted on
05/10/2009 6:44:43 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: decimon
That clears that up. I had been wondering, aimlessly.
36 posted on
05/10/2009 7:08:00 PM PDT by
caver
(Obama's first goals: allow more killing of innocents and allow the killers of innocents to go free.)
To: decimon
Numbers are no longer what they used to be in their prime!
To: decimon; Myrddin; CodeToad; hiredhand
Just as I always suspected.
(Just kidding. I have no idea what they are talking about.)
39 posted on
05/10/2009 7:34:46 PM PDT by
Travis McGee
("Foreign Enemies And Traitors" is being shipped from the printer.)
To: buckrodgers
42 posted on
05/10/2009 7:40:04 PM PDT by
Straight Vermonter
(Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
To: The_Reader_David
46 posted on
05/10/2009 8:19:07 PM PDT by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: decimon
The observed patterns may well impact the security of public key encryption e.g. RSA that depends on the product of two large prime numbers.
48 posted on
05/10/2009 8:32:02 PM PDT by
Myrddin
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson