1 posted on
05/25/2009 3:47:04 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
To: StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 21twelve; 24Karet; 2ndDivisionVet; 31R1O; ...
2 posted on
05/25/2009 3:47:24 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: SunkenCiv
I don't recall ever reading that Trajan had a palace in Dacia. And why 101, as opposed to 106? Can they really date it that precisely? Wouldn't he have been more likely to build a palace there
after he had actually conquered the place?
Looks like someone is trying to drum up tourism in tough economic times.
3 posted on
05/25/2009 4:01:34 PM PDT by
InABunkerUnderSF
(California -- Ya es como México)
To: SunkenCiv
These claims have to be taken cum grano salis since the Romanians (nee Rumanians) have been trying for years to claim Western heritage, hence the name change years ago.
4 posted on
05/25/2009 4:18:18 PM PDT by
Mikey_1962
(Obama: The Affirmative Action President)
To: SunkenCiv
5 posted on
05/25/2009 4:23:13 PM PDT by
Perdogg
(Sarah Palin-Liz Cheney 2012)
To: SunkenCiv
Romania -- isn't that the place that Simona Halep comes from??
7 posted on
05/25/2009 5:51:15 PM PDT by
struggle
((The struggle continues))
To: SunkenCiv
Ah, but when in Romania, did Trajan do like the Romanians do?
17 posted on
05/27/2009 3:35:10 PM PDT by
wildbill
( The reason you're so jealous is that the voices talk only to me.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
