Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Yeah, good guess. Geez, tidal transfer of momentum has been going on since orbit started. :') Bodies in prograde motion around the parent body also slow on their axis, because they are transferring momentum to the parent body, but the parent body is (obviously) larger and the satellites move out. Bodies in retrograde gradually migrate inward and kerplunk.
1 posted on 06/01/2009 6:59:33 PM PDT by SunkenCiv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
To: Swordmaker; Fred Nerks; 75thOVI; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; ...
The Moon stopped turning on its axis because it has been transferring momentum to the Earth and is a mere 1 per cent of Earth's mass. Meanwhile the two bodies have been moving away from one another as a consequence of this momentum transfer.
 
Catastrophism
 
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic ·

2 posted on 06/01/2009 7:01:29 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv
Anybody able to calculate the inverse-square loss of insolation due to the movement away from the Sun?

Global cooling is comin' for ya!

3 posted on 06/01/2009 7:02:46 PM PDT by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KevinDavis; annie laurie; garbageseeker; Knitting A Conundrum; Viking2002; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ...
This is pertinent to the list, because there are jumbo planets orbiting their stars at distances less than that of Mercury. Unless they are recent captures, they must have been burped out of their parent stars at some point in the past.
 
X-Planets
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic ·
Google news searches: exoplanet · exosolar · extrasolar ·

4 posted on 06/01/2009 7:03:16 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv

Sounds like that Global Warming thing would come in pretty handy in a millennium or two.


5 posted on 06/01/2009 7:04:09 PM PDT by NonValueAdded ("Tyranny is always whimsical." Mark Steyn 3/9/2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv
Well when you have something in the center, that every thing in a system is revolving around, and that something is burning and spewing its mass consistently into space I would guess it loses a little mass. Consequences.
7 posted on 06/01/2009 7:15:50 PM PDT by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv
As the sun shines, it is losing mass by the conversion of hydrogen to helium and the resultant radiation of energy which is equal to some amount of mass according to the most well know formula in history.

As the sun loses mass it seems reasonable that a body orbiting it would move in a larger orbit.

But what do I know?

8 posted on 06/01/2009 7:16:23 PM PDT by muir_redwoods ( Hey, remember the last head of state who dictated the design of automobiles?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv

I wonder if coronal mass ejections (CMEs) effect the movement of the Sun at all? Newton’s Law: for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.


10 posted on 06/01/2009 7:17:39 PM PDT by ETL (ALL the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv

So in approx. 5 Billion years when the Sun expands as a red giant, we’ll be about 100,000 miles further away from it — probably still close enough to get roasted...


12 posted on 06/01/2009 7:19:25 PM PDT by mikrofon (Oh Noes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv

15 posted on 06/01/2009 7:21:15 PM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv

How long until the “experts” begin claiming this all is also “human-caused”... and the solution is to eliminate all Christians from the planet...

Ok - that last part was meant as a bit of sarcasm... But seriously - humans WILL eventually get the blame for this. Just watch.


16 posted on 06/01/2009 7:22:21 PM PDT by TheBattman (Pray for our country...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv

Duh, it’s man made Global Warming and the planet is moving toward cooler space, just like warm air rushes to cool air...EVERYONE knows this is the consensus and there is no more discussion on the matter.


19 posted on 06/01/2009 7:26:11 PM PDT by phatus maximus ( John 6:29. Learn it, love it, live it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv

We are all going to die.


31 posted on 06/01/2009 7:39:19 PM PDT by razorback-bert (We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv

Entropy?


32 posted on 06/01/2009 7:40:31 PM PDT by stayathomemom (Beware of cat attacks while typing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv

The End is Near! At least getting nearer at 15cm.


34 posted on 06/01/2009 7:40:43 PM PDT by Jabba the Nutt (Are they insane, stupid or just evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv

Solar wind blowing Earth away.... /rimshot


37 posted on 06/01/2009 7:56:22 PM PDT by theymakemesick (You may be a terrorist if you went to church last Sunday or think "shall not be infringed" means it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv
SUVs, incandescent lights, and cattle farts.
38 posted on 06/01/2009 8:08:01 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Justice is blind. Sonia Sotomayor is not even qualified to sit on an IMPARTIAL jury.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv

Yes, but what about the Lense–Thirring effect?


39 posted on 06/01/2009 8:08:57 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( Don't mess with the mockingbird! /\/\ http://tiny.cc/freepthis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv
The other theory is that the speed of light is slowing down, (therefore it looks as if the earth is moving away from the sun.)Also h is increasing. It appears that hc is constant not c. It has been known for a while that the relationship between orbital time and atomic time is not constant.
40 posted on 06/01/2009 8:20:27 PM PDT by D Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv
So Global Warming has another scientific data obstacle looming. Solar minimum, prograde motion, CO2 seasonal decline in the northern hemisphere, record low tides in the N. Pacific and Blue Whales off Long Island.

And I thought the fur growing on my ass was due to aging....


41 posted on 06/01/2009 8:24:26 PM PDT by BIGLOOK (Government needs a Keelhauling now and then.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv

Inside of geosync orbit, the orbit decays, outside and the object moves farther away.


42 posted on 06/01/2009 8:59:11 PM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson