Yeah, good guess. Geez, tidal transfer of momentum has been going on since orbit started. :') Bodies in prograde motion around the parent body also slow on their axis, because they are transferring momentum to the parent body, but the parent body is (obviously) larger and the satellites move out. Bodies in retrograde gradually migrate inward and kerplunk.
1 posted on
06/01/2009 6:59:33 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: Swordmaker; Fred Nerks; 75thOVI; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; ...
The Moon stopped turning on its axis because it has been transferring momentum to the Earth and is a mere 1 per cent of Earth's mass. Meanwhile the two bodies have been moving away from one another as a consequence of this momentum transfer.
2 posted on
06/01/2009 7:01:29 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: SunkenCiv
Anybody able to calculate the inverse-square loss of insolation due to the movement away from the Sun?
Global cooling is comin' for ya!
3 posted on
06/01/2009 7:02:46 PM PDT by
stboz
To: KevinDavis; annie laurie; garbageseeker; Knitting A Conundrum; Viking2002; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ...
This is pertinent to the list, because there are jumbo planets orbiting their stars at distances less than that of Mercury. Unless they are recent captures, they must have been burped out of their parent stars at some point in the past.
4 posted on
06/01/2009 7:03:16 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: SunkenCiv
Sounds like that Global Warming thing would come in pretty handy in a millennium or two.
5 posted on
06/01/2009 7:04:09 PM PDT by
NonValueAdded
("Tyranny is always whimsical." Mark Steyn 3/9/2009)
To: SunkenCiv
Well when you have something in the center, that every thing in a system is revolving around, and that something is burning and spewing its mass consistently into space I would guess it loses a little mass. Consequences.
7 posted on
06/01/2009 7:15:50 PM PDT by
Red_Devil 232
(VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
To: SunkenCiv
As the sun shines, it is losing mass by the conversion of hydrogen to helium and the resultant radiation of energy which is equal to some amount of mass according to the most well know formula in history.
As the sun loses mass it seems reasonable that a body orbiting it would move in a larger orbit.
But what do I know?
8 posted on
06/01/2009 7:16:23 PM PDT by
muir_redwoods
( Hey, remember the last head of state who dictated the design of automobiles?)
To: SunkenCiv
I wonder if coronal mass ejections (CMEs) effect the movement of the Sun at all? Newton’s Law: for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
10 posted on
06/01/2009 7:17:39 PM PDT by
ETL
(ALL the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
To: SunkenCiv
So in approx. 5 Billion years when the Sun expands as a red giant, we’ll be about 100,000 miles further away from it — probably still close enough to get roasted...
12 posted on
06/01/2009 7:19:25 PM PDT by
mikrofon
(Oh Noes!)
To: SunkenCiv
15 posted on
06/01/2009 7:21:15 PM PDT by
JoeProBono
(A closed mouth gathers no feet)
To: SunkenCiv
How long until the “experts” begin claiming this all is also “human-caused”... and the solution is to eliminate all Christians from the planet...
Ok - that last part was meant as a bit of sarcasm... But seriously - humans WILL eventually get the blame for this. Just watch.
16 posted on
06/01/2009 7:22:21 PM PDT by
TheBattman
(Pray for our country...)
To: SunkenCiv
Duh, it’s man made Global Warming and the planet is moving toward cooler space, just like warm air rushes to cool air...EVERYONE knows this is the consensus and there is no more discussion on the matter.
19 posted on
06/01/2009 7:26:11 PM PDT by
phatus maximus
( John 6:29. Learn it, love it, live it.)
To: SunkenCiv
31 posted on
06/01/2009 7:39:19 PM PDT by
razorback-bert
(We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers.)
To: SunkenCiv
32 posted on
06/01/2009 7:40:31 PM PDT by
stayathomemom
(Beware of cat attacks while typing!)
To: SunkenCiv
The End is Near! At least getting nearer at 15cm.
34 posted on
06/01/2009 7:40:43 PM PDT by
Jabba the Nutt
(Are they insane, stupid or just evil?)
To: SunkenCiv
Solar wind blowing Earth away.... /rimshot
37 posted on
06/01/2009 7:56:22 PM PDT by
theymakemesick
(You may be a terrorist if you went to church last Sunday or think "shall not be infringed" means it)
To: SunkenCiv
SUVs, incandescent lights, and cattle farts.
38 posted on
06/01/2009 8:08:01 PM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(Justice is blind. Sonia Sotomayor is not even qualified to sit on an IMPARTIAL jury.)
To: SunkenCiv
Yes, but what about the LenseThirring effect?
39 posted on
06/01/2009 8:08:57 PM PDT by
smokingfrog
( Don't mess with the mockingbird! /\/\ http://tiny.cc/freepthis)
To: SunkenCiv
The other theory is that the speed of light is slowing down, (therefore it looks as if the earth is moving away from the sun.)Also h is increasing. It appears that hc is constant not c. It has been known for a while that the relationship between orbital time and atomic time is not constant.
40 posted on
06/01/2009 8:20:27 PM PDT by
D Rider
To: SunkenCiv
So Global Warming has another scientific data obstacle looming. Solar minimum, prograde motion, CO2 seasonal decline in the northern hemisphere, record low tides in the N. Pacific and Blue Whales off Long Island.
And I thought the fur growing on my ass was due to aging....
41 posted on
06/01/2009 8:24:26 PM PDT by
BIGLOOK
(Government needs a Keelhauling now and then.)
To: SunkenCiv
Inside of geosync orbit, the orbit decays, outside and the object moves farther away.
42 posted on
06/01/2009 8:59:11 PM PDT by
staytrue
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson