Replies

To: meandog

LOL

Now Rosie’s “wife” gets to present a claim for half of Rosie’s estate.

If they were simply cohabitating, the “wife” would get little or nothing.

6 posted on 10/21/2009 7:51:17 AM PDT by earlJam

To: earlJam

If they were simply cohabitating, the “wife” would get little or nothing.

Tell that to the late Lee Marvin.

11 posted on 10/21/2009 7:53:09 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Joe Wilson speaks for me.)

To: earlJam

If they were simply cohabitating, the “wife” would get little or nothing.

Oops, I was WRONG!!!

I dug into palimony further, and found that the Cali Supreme Court overturned Marvin v. Marvin.

You're right, "no soup for you!" (for just living together.)

19 posted on 10/21/2009 7:58:05 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Joe Wilson speaks for me.)

To: earlJam

I know..for the life of me, I don’t know why wealthy gay men want this marriage thing so badly...THEY HAD IT MADE!!!

99 posted on 10/25/2009 8:55:32 PM PDT by Hildy

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794