Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: indcons; blam; SunkenCiv; neverdem; aculeus; thefactor

Big Battle Revisionism ping...Hundred Years’ War ping...Agincourt ping...there...that should cover it.


2 posted on 10/25/2009 4:24:03 AM PDT by Pharmboy (The Stone Age did not end because they ran out of stones...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Pharmboy

thanks, bfl


25 posted on 10/25/2009 11:41:09 AM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Pharmboy
The historians have concluded that the English could not have been outnumbered by more than about two to one.

Highly unlikely. The battle was devastating to French morale, which it wouldn't have been had they lost a roughly equal conflict. It also made an enormous stir throughout Europe, which again an equal conflict would not have.

It is also relevant that the English were exhausted from long marching trying to evade the French, suffering severely from dysyntery and significantly malnourished.

If the English hadn't tried to stick with their archers and dismounted men at arms approach to battle after effective artillery made it obsolete, they could have kicked ass for at least another century.

30 posted on 10/25/2009 2:05:21 PM PDT by Sherman Logan ("The price of freedom is the toleration of imperfections." Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Pharmboy

bttt


34 posted on 10/25/2009 4:39:25 PM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson