Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If Republicans are irrelevant........why then?
11-16-09 | Gillmeister

Posted on 11/16/2009 12:54:06 PM PST by Gillmeister

Can someone explain this to me?


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Conspiracy
KEYWORDS:
We hear every day on the lib talk radio that "We won, Republicans have no power, they are irrelevant.........We see this fatso Ed Schultz spewing how stupid and worthless Republicans are, then spends 60-70% of his show talking about us!! That little boy Rachel Maddow has 5 segments a night and 3-4 are about Republicans, same with the little girl Olbeymann.

What causes libs to spend all their time talking about and mocking Republicans instead of propping up and defending the Messiah?

Could it be, they have nothing to say about the terrible job he's doing, and disagree with alot of his policies?

1 posted on 11/16/2009 12:54:06 PM PST by Gillmeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Gillmeister

FEAR!


2 posted on 11/16/2009 12:55:25 PM PST by Navy Patriot (Sarah and the Conservatives will rock your world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gillmeister

Yes, but remember...they are only talking to twelve people and eleven are people who are watching to see how stupid they are...


3 posted on 11/16/2009 12:56:00 PM PST by jessduntno (TOTUS fails and POtuS becomes a phuttering stuck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gillmeister

Yours are words from the wise to those who scream “Third Party!” every time a pin drops.

Our best hope is to take control of the GOP from the Rockefeller Republicans.


4 posted on 11/16/2009 1:04:39 PM PST by Artemis Webb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

They are irrevalent (for now) only because they are outnumbered and have no influence.


5 posted on 11/16/2009 1:05:34 PM PST by DallasDeb (USAFA '06 Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DallasDeb

Ugh! “irrevalent” = “irrelevant”


6 posted on 11/16/2009 1:07:02 PM PST by DallasDeb (USAFA '06 Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb

Yes it is.

We already have stories that Axelrod and Soros are working to push RINOs.

There’s no way Baraq can win in 012 straight up.

But a Clintonian plurality is very possible in a 3 way race.


7 posted on 11/16/2009 1:07:29 PM PST by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gillmeister

Remember - the MSM speaks about want they WANT to be true and NOT what is true! It’s call propaganda - don’t listen to them ever then you won’t be concerned about what they say!


8 posted on 11/16/2009 1:11:17 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

ok.....thanks.

Therefore I will have no opinion about anything ever again.......good advice.


9 posted on 11/16/2009 1:16:40 PM PST by Gillmeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb
Our best hope is to take control of the GOP from the Rockefeller Republicans.
It will never happen. Conservatives don't have the money to buy out the Rockefellers, the Bushes, and the other plutocrats who own the GOP. They own it, they run it.
Third party candidates are appropriate when there is a liberal running for the GOP, esp. a weak one. NY23 for example. If it wasn't so last-minute the Conservative probably would have won. 3rd party against a RINO accomplishes three things: 1) you don't have to vote for a Democrat 2) you get to vote for a conservative 3) you may get rid of a RINO.
10 posted on 11/16/2009 1:35:02 PM PST by gorilla_warrior (Metrosexual hairless RINOs for hopey-changey bipartisan-ness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb

Yep take it back. A third party is a third rail.


11 posted on 11/16/2009 1:35:11 PM PST by b4its2late (Before you can control a horse, you have to break it. Sound familiar?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gillmeister

Don’t take it so personal! A lot of people here post things for EVERYONE’s ears, not as a personal reply to you- like this one


12 posted on 11/16/2009 1:47:12 PM PST by Mr. K (Deathly afraid my typos become a freeper catchphrase...I'm series!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Gillmeister

LOL! NOT YOU! It’s the MSM - they offer nothing for Republicans. They don’t want you or I to have an opinion - we should just believe because they say.


13 posted on 11/16/2009 3:05:39 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson