Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Shutter Island" Movie
2/27/2010

Posted on 02/27/2010 11:11:24 AM PST by GLDNGUN

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: Eccl 10:2

Great point! I am going to go download a “special” internet copy ;)


41 posted on 02/28/2010 12:55:40 PM PST by JerseyDvl (The Obama Doctrine in 6 words - Embolden Enemies, Abandon Allies, WEAKEN AMERICA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Eccl 10:2

Here is the site I used to watch Avitar, 2012, Book of Eli, and many other great movies.
Not a dime to the Hollyweird Liberal Kooks!

http://www.videoweed.com/file/0yg6zipcyfqni

Reminder: Don’t expect the best quality...You get what you pay for :)


42 posted on 02/28/2010 1:00:54 PM PST by JerseyDvl (The Obama Doctrine in 6 words - Embolden Enemies, Abandon Allies, WEAKEN AMERICA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JerseyDvl

Stealing rules! /sarc


43 posted on 02/28/2010 2:04:40 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: GLDNGUN

The plot has a number of logical inconsistences if ‘Teddy’ really was insane and had been incarcerated on the island for two years—

—Would a doctor who believes in thorazine really believe the ‘talking cure’ could work on someone who is criminally insane?

—Why would have Teddy have been judged insane for killing his wife, after he finds out she just did away with their three kids? Sounds like a crime of passion, not of insanity.

—Is this ‘role-playing’ game scenario even remotely realistic? Certainly nothing like this has ever gone on in a real insane asylum.

—Would they have taken a chance and let their most dangerous patient off the island, even temporarily?

—Wouldn’t ‘Teddy,’ who have presumably been incarcerated in that place for the last two years and was desperate to leave, immediately seize his opportunity and take off in the other direction rather than get back on the boat?

—Wouldn’t Teddy immediately have recognized his new US Marshal partner as his psychiatrist? Wouldn’t he have felt a strong sense of deja vu coming back to the island, and recognized everyone there? Wouldn’t he have figured out that he is carrying around a toy gun?

—Or how about the scene in the crypt, where his partner is telling him that he has been lured to the island after Teddy had started to research the place and suspect wrong doing, in order to do away with a potential whistle blower. Would his psychiatrist have fed his paranioa and delusions like this?

I prefer the origonal plot line, in which they have decided to entrap the snooping federal agent by slowly drugging him and convincing him he is insane.

But you can take everything in this movie two ways.

Like his final statement ‘’Is it better to live as a monster or die as a good man?’’ ‘Live as a monster’ might refer to his status as a convicted murderer living in an insane asylum. ‘Die as a good man’ might refer to the living death of a lobotomy, but having fought for the truth until the end.


44 posted on 02/28/2010 11:36:24 PM PST by starvosan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheMom
Shutter Island ping.

Sounds like people like it. I'm scared to read too much of this thread in case there are any spoilers in the posts. ;-)

45 posted on 03/01/2010 10:50:54 PM PST by Allegra (It doesn't matter what this tagline says...the liberals are going to call it "racist.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: GLDNGUN

Yours was my take also


46 posted on 03/01/2010 10:55:17 PM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eccl 10:2
“Just a friendly reminder that every dollar you pay to Hollywood helps to fuel their anti-conservative, anti-Christian agenda.”
_____________________________________________

Don't make blanket statements.

There are many people who are conservative who work in the entertainment industry.
Many actors, camera-men, directors, caterers etc....
There are also many democrat leaning industry people who go to work every day and keep their opinions to themselves.

My son works in the entertainment field. A very nice conservative young man. There are many like him.

47 posted on 03/01/2010 11:01:54 PM PST by Aurorales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: starvosan
The plot has a number of logical inconsistences if ‘Teddy’ really was insane and had been incarcerated on the island for two years—

—Would a doctor who believes in thorazine really believe the ‘talking cure’ could work on someone who is criminally insane?


Didn't the doctor PREFER non-drug and non-surgical procedures?

—Why would have Teddy have been judged insane for killing his wife, after he finds out she just did away with their three kids? Sounds like a crime of passion, not of insanity.

Was he judged insane for the killing? Or did killing his wife make him insane? I think it would be the latter.

—Is this ‘role-playing’ game scenario even remotely realistic? Certainly nothing like this has ever gone on in a real insane asylum.

No, nothing like that had ever happened. And that's exactly what the head doctor told "Teddy" - that it was the most elaborate role-playing ever tried. Was it realistic? Probably not to the extent they did it, but, hey, it's a piece of fiction.

—Would they have taken a chance and let their most dangerous patient off the island, even temporarily?

I don't recall they let him off the island, unless you are talking about the ferry ride, but there very well could have been precautions taken on board, such as orderlies, guards, etc. hidden.

—Wouldn’t ‘Teddy,’ who have presumably been incarcerated in that place for the last two years and was desperate to leave, immediately seize his opportunity and take off in the other direction rather than get back on the boat?

Desperate to leave? Teddy (at first) wanted to get on the island to find the supposed arsonist. I'm not sure what you mean by the rest of your statement. When did he have the opportunity to "take off...rather than get back on the boat"?

—Wouldn’t Teddy immediately have recognized his new US Marshal partner as his psychiatrist? Wouldn’t he have felt a strong sense of deja vu coming back to the island, and recognized everyone there? Wouldn’t he have figured out that he is carrying around a toy gun?

Yes, you would think he would recognize some people like the doctors who had been treating him. Could a real, strong delusion overcome that and his being on the island for the past 2 years? I don't know if it could in reality or not. As a patient in Ward C, he would not be familiar with the rest of the island which is where he spent most of his time.

—Or how about the scene in the crypt, where his partner is telling him that he has been lured to the island after Teddy had started to research the place and suspect wrong doing, in order to do away with a potential whistle blower. Would his psychiatrist have fed his paranioa and delusions like this?

This is probably your strongest point. No, it wouldn't seem "right" for his doctor to do that. One explanation could be that this part was a delusion on Teddy's part, although the movie certainly doesn't make it seem like a hallucination. Another possibility is that the doctor was trying to give him a reason to leave the island. "Teddy" wanted to be there as part of his delusion to "blow the lid off the place". His doctor wanted him to "get well" and have the desire to get off the island. Perhaps the doc thought that if he fed Teddy's delusion a reason to get off the island instead of going deeper into the island delusion, it would shake him enough to get him back to reality. A stretch, I know.

I prefer the origonal plot line, in which they have decided to entrap the snooping federal agent by slowly drugging him and convincing him he is insane.

Well, yes, I think most would prefer that it went that way.

But you can take everything in this movie two ways.

To an extent, which is what makes the movie so fascinating. I do think the evidence is strongly in favor of "Teddy" being a delusion of Edward.

Like his final statement ‘’Is it better to live as a monster or die as a good man?’’ ‘Live as a monster’ might refer to his status as a convicted murderer living in an insane asylum. ‘Die as a good man’ might refer to the living death of a lobotomy, but having fought for the truth until the end.

Yes, or it could have been his "partner", "Chuck" who he was referring to as "living as a monster" if indeed Teddy was real and not an illusion of Edward, but again, I think the evidence is strongly against that.

One of the clues that "Chuck" was not really a US Marshall, was the difficulty that he had in removing the gun from his holster when they first arrived on the island. And what are the odds that Edward's full name just happened to be a re-arrangement of Teddy's full name?

Again, I think it's discussions such as these that add to the movie's mystery.
48 posted on 03/02/2010 12:27:40 AM PST by GLDNGUN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson