Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Not only did Obama not attend Columbia College...Harvard has no record of him either...nor Hawaii
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/02/court-grants-motion-for-leave-to-file.html ^ | 3-3-10 | medical

Posted on 03/03/2010 10:49:07 PM PST by capacommie

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320321-324 next last
To: Fred Nerks

http://ids.lib.harvard.edu/ids/view/11896802


281 posted on 03/12/2010 6:14:38 PM PST by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Irish Eyes

dang, hes gotta big head in that photo


282 posted on 03/12/2010 6:18:46 PM PST by chicken head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: Irish Eyes

I have seen that image of obama in the library a hundred times, and I was one of the first, if not THE first to post the group image with the NAMES.

The question I am asking is; why would Harvard Law, having over a hundred years of group images on their website, of Harvard Law students, not have the groups showing for the very years that obama attended?

Go back, pick up the link, check it out for yourself. I’m through here.


283 posted on 03/12/2010 6:21:12 PM PST by Fred Nerks (Fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

Interesting. That’s definitely not the norm for higher education in the US. It doesn’t look like it was always the norm for Harvard Law either as the pictures are sporadic and not there for every class. I don’t think I saw any b/w 1987 and 2004, for example.

I’m not sure what point you’re trying to make exactly? That Barry wasn’t at Harvard?

Frankly I’d be more suspicious if he had a law degree from what the MSM would call a “lesser school,” as Harvard is more a (leftist) political institution than an academic one.

As long as he showed up to class occasionally and regurgitated leftist talking points even semi-literately on the tests he would get his degree. We already know he managed to be head of the Law Review without writing anything. The whole institution of Harvard has been joke for almost 50 years now. They’re not going to flunk an affirmative action case.


284 posted on 03/14/2010 8:28:32 PM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks
Here's some text I found on there. It looks like it was written before they started taking class group photos (divided into "sections," b/c there are now too many in one class for a decent photo) again in 2004.

Subject: Classes included in the collection are: ca. 1875, 1877, 1881, 1888, 1893 or 1896, 1895, 1897, 1899, ca. 1900, 1901, 1902, 1904, 1906 - 1912, ca. 1914, ca. 1916, 1919 - 1922, ca. 1923, 1924 - 1927, 1929 - 1934, 1936 - 1942, 1946, 1950, 2003 - 2007. Also included are pictures showing only graduate students from 1926, 1932, 1936, 1951, 1952, 1956, 1970, 1977, 1978, 1980, 1983 - 1985, and two pictures showing only the female students from 1953. There are no pictures of the full graduating classes from 1951 through 2002.

285 posted on 03/14/2010 8:31:10 PM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: capacommie

After enlarging, and checking the light and shadows, I agree, this photo has been tweeked bigtime!


286 posted on 03/14/2010 8:40:40 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Democracy, the vilest form of government, pits the greed of an angry mob vs. the rights of a man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Plummz

What point am I trying to make? I thought it was quite simple. The image exists. It’s captioned with the names of the students. The image is identified as Harvard Law Review with a Volume Number.

Why has the image not been included here:

http://via.lib.harvard.edu/via/deliver/deepLinkResults?kw2=paul%20freund&kw1=harvard%20law%20school%20class&bool1=not&index2=Name&index1=Title&sort1=@sortDate


287 posted on 03/14/2010 8:53:22 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

This is quite simple; and I already tried to explain this to you in post 279.

The photos in question are pictures of the staff of Harvard Law Review. They are not photos of a law school class.

Law Review is a student organization. It is not a graduating class.

So, you won’t find those pictures when you search on the term “class,” as in the link you keep posting.

I found them just by searching on “Obama.”

I’m sure you will find them if you search on “Law Review” rather than “class.”

Quite simple.

Hope this helps.


288 posted on 03/14/2010 10:11:09 PM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: Plummz

OK, thanks, got it now, sorry it took so long. Have you found that group from the Harvard Law Review on the Harvard site, and can you direct me to a link?


289 posted on 03/14/2010 10:33:57 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: Plummz

http://via.lib.harvard.edu/via/deliver/chunkDisplay?_collection=via&inoID=17093&recordNumber=1&startChunkNum=1&endChunkNum=2&totalChunkCount=2&chunkNumber=2&method=view&image=thumb&offset=0

found that...


290 posted on 03/14/2010 11:02:28 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

Yeah, that from the 1990-91 Law Review when he was the do-nothing President.

Here’s the 1989-90 Law Review photo:

http://via.lib.harvard.edu/via/deliver/fullRecordDisplay?_collection=via&inoID=25761&recordNumber=2&fullgridwidth=5&method=view&recordViewFormat=grid

Both pop up when you search Obama. So does the NYTimes picture in front of the bookshelves. And a fourth picture shows up, but it’s a picture of an old statue; and you need a special login to click through and see what the caption is (and why it has the word Obama in it).


291 posted on 03/15/2010 12:03:07 AM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: angcat

They’ve been silenced, Chicago style.


292 posted on 04/21/2015 3:44:48 AM PDT by fivecatsandadog ("Islam is Islam. There are no modifiers. It's a political movement masquerading as a religion.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

His UPPER arms look gigantic. Compare them with others’ arms in the photo. And he was always SKINNY.


293 posted on 04/24/2015 9:56:50 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

I searched for Obama, and four images came up. One was of a statue of some kind, and the other four were of the Law Review staff.


294 posted on 04/24/2015 9:58:55 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: capacommie

Imagine if he were a Pubbie


295 posted on 04/24/2015 9:59:25 PM PDT by 353FMG (muzzies are a national security liability.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou

Wow. That bulbous nose is definitely pre-surgery.


296 posted on 04/24/2015 9:59:48 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: capacommie

Some day the truth will be revealed and we will become the laughing stock of the world.


297 posted on 04/24/2015 10:01:47 PM PDT by 353FMG (muzzies are a national security liability.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: capacommie

All it means is that our NSA cannot be trusted and neither can GWB< because he shold have known about this hoax.


298 posted on 04/24/2015 10:09:08 PM PDT by 353FMG (muzzies are a national security liability.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

There are approx. one hundred years of group images of Harvard Law graduates in the collection shown, and the only years missing are those during which Obama supposedly attended.

http://via.lib.harvard.edu/via/deliver/results?_collection=via&displayCell=1


299 posted on 04/24/2015 10:20:26 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan
LAW REVIEW IMAGE VOL 104 1990-1991


300 posted on 04/24/2015 10:46:29 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320321-324 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson