Replies

Do Ursines defecate in wilderness areas?

I’m a little surprised they haven’t already.

Actually, I don’t think so. I think those folks are already so aware of the true nature of FR, and its identity, that they would very soon realize that we weren’t these guys, whoever they are.

But they might believe that there are some Freepers here who are also fans of Sam Kennedy.

NO, it would have already occured, and it obviously hasn’t.

Stop sweating the crap! They want to discourage us, don’t let them do it!

I am not shaking in my shoes over it.

In that vain I guess Constitutional REPUBLIC is suspect also!

Will our enemies use the "similarity" of the title "the Gurdians of the..." to bash us?

They will try. It's what 1960s Marxist-Alinsky campus/street revolutionary rabble and their ideological issue do.

Markos Moulitsas Zuniga is an ardent admirer of Saul Alinsky. His book Taking On the System said so and made that clear.

His netroot followers.. well that's another story.. uh.. well they're kind of dumb. See Matt Bai's book, The Argument – Billionaires, Bloggers, and the Battle to Remake Democratic Politics

An interesting book I read, though the author is sympathetic to the ultra left netroots. "One of the hallmarks of netroots culture was a complete disconnect from history – meaning, basically, anything that had happened before 1998. The political consciousness of most of the bloggers seemed to begin sometime around impeachment, when they had first tuned in. Whatever had gone on before then, the fight between Clinton and the liberal establishment, the very real debates inside the party over trade and taxes and defense – all of these things felt as ancient to the bloggers as the underlying causes of the Peloponnesian War, and about as useful. It wasn't just that the bloggers didn't know much about the political world before impeachment, it was that they didn't want to know, either. So burning was their contempt for "Washington insiders" and the "mainstream media" that they were moved to dismiss not just the individuals who fell into these categories, but all the knowledge such people had accumulated. In a sense, the way the netroots saw it, the more you knew about Democratic politics before 1998, the less relevant you actually were."

Of COURSE that is part of the strategy. Soviet counter measures did this to internal dissent in the 1920s, etc. It is a standard communist tactic. It is not co-incidence. I am telling you folks, it is starting. And that is precisely why I recommended establishing Committees of Correspondence to keep Freepers in touch with each other in case FR were to ever be seized by Fascist Authority; it could be reborn many times over as we take our clue from how freedom moment people work and worked in Nicaragua, Cuba, Red China, Myanmar, North Korea, former East Germany, communist Poland, etc. etc. etc.

.
What enemies?

Of course. Half of them are so dim-witted that they probably really do think that FR is just that group'd online forum.