"My baby needs child support for his old age!"
"Hi, my name is Sue and you're gonna die!"
"Tell me something I don't know, Sonny!"
"He bit like he had teeth and kicked me with his walker; I tell ya I fought older men, just can't remember when."
Why would a mother “give up” on recovering child support for her child when the alleged father is a LTC in the Air Force?
I noticed this section was repeated twice in the article:
Now a widow, Douglas said she could use the $57,000 that she claims Grass owes her, which includes ever-rising interest. But more important than the money, she said, is the principle. When she managed to locate him in Texas, she hired a process server to deliver court papers.
I think that is the reason she’s pushing the case, for enough money to fund her retirement for a year or two.
But there should be a statute of limitations on debt involved. Even the most liberal courts say you can’t go forward after 12 years - and this is half a century.
“Okay but I get him on weekends.”
Wouldn’t it be a hoot if old coot requested a DNA test and it turned out he wasn’t the Baby Daddy? Now that’s a Maury episode I would DVR to watch!
Calling Maury Povich!
In Texas once the child reaches the age of 26 it’s over with. At least that’s how it used to be.
If this lady remarried and her and her husband claimed the kid as a dependent then I think the IRS should hit her for back taxes if she gets money from the old dude.