Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: LibWhacker

This posts are rediculous. First, it pre-supposes these guys no how things work and that something is behaving very oddly, the truth is they don’t know jack squat about “space”. How long ago was it we decided Pluto wasn’t a planet? This is the least reliable field of the sciences, and full of ignorant and arrogant people, IMHO.


15 posted on 08/03/2010 1:08:07 PM PDT by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Scythian
This is the least reliable field of the sciences, and full of ignorant and arrogant people, IMHO.

They may be ignorant and arrogant, but their models work beautifully in explaining the orbits of earth bound satellites. They are humbly and modestly trying to understand why the same models do not work for satellites grazing earth. And even then, in the case of assymetrical orbits, they do work. Whether or not Pluto is a planet is a purely semantic issue. Call Pluto what you will. Whatever you chose to call it has nothing at all to do with astrodynamics.

24 posted on 08/03/2010 1:19:06 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (The naked casuistry of the high priests of Warmism would make a Jesuit blush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson