[TalonDJ]

A similar story, by the otherwise nutcase Richard Hoagland:

'otherwise'? That story is total crap too. He predicates the entire convoluted logic train on claiming the solid boosters could not have been more efficient than expected when they certainly could have. As with most nutjobbery he does not bother offer real logic to counter that one premise and instead piles his arguments on other areas to distract the reader from that lacking. There is absolutely nothing at that link to disprove the supposition that the rocket's engines worked better than expected. He simply said that could not have been it and goes on to gush over unrelated half truths and nonsense.

[Yo-Yo]

With Hoagland it's always about the Hyperdimensional Physics.