Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawsuits carry over $50K price tag for Jackson Co. Sheriff's Office (Concealed Handgun Permit Issue)
KDRV TV ^ | 8/23/2010 | Steven Sandberg

Posted on 08/24/2010 12:32:30 PM PDT by Rio

MEDFORD, Ore. - Two lawsuits involving the Jackson County Sheriff's Office are costing the county more than $50,000, according to numbers released this week by the Medford Mail Tribune newspaper.

Jackson County Sheriff Mike Winters must pay more than $40,000 in legal fees in a case involving concealed handgun permit holder information.


TOPICS: Local News
KEYWORDS: banglist; chl; oregon
Local Oregon sheriff is unwilling to release names and addresses of Concealed Handgun License holders without a fight.

And a second issue in which the same Sheriff denied a CHL to a "medical" marijuana user.

1 posted on 08/24/2010 12:32:33 PM PDT by Rio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rio
”Photobucket"
2 posted on 08/24/2010 12:37:50 PM PDT by xuberalles (The Right Stuff: The Best Anti-Liberal Novelties On The Net ! http://www.zazzle.com/xuberalles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rio
And a second issue in which the same Sheriff denied a CHL to a "medical" marijuana user.

CCW is issued under state law, not federal. If she is legal in that state then the sheriff doesn't have a leg to stand on. I just read the Oregon CCW law in question, and nothing like "being in a state of violation of federal drug laws even without a conviction" is in there.

3 posted on 08/24/2010 1:01:19 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

But purchasing a firearm requires answering the Federal
question about being addicted to marihuana, and having
a pot card is pretty good evidence that one is indeed addicted.


4 posted on 08/24/2010 1:06:49 PM PDT by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rio

This is why it is so important to work at the local level to elect sheriffs like this one who put the rights of the people of the county above the rights of the media. A good man for the job!


5 posted on 08/24/2010 1:08:14 PM PDT by 'smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rio; All
Why don't gun owners get the same "Right to Privacy" as Abortionists?
6 posted on 08/24/2010 1:08:14 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA (Anti-Gunners suffer from Factose Intolerance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rahbert
But purchasing a firearm requires answering the Federal question about being addicted to marihuana

It's about the CCW, not the purchase. I didn't see anything about that in the law.

having a pot card is pretty good evidence that one is indeed addicted.

Indicates a possibility, not a definite, and is also not part of the CCW law.

7 posted on 08/24/2010 2:02:33 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rahbert
Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana, or any depressant, stimulant, or narcotic drug, or any other controlled substance?

Got it covered.

And everyone that takes a drink is an alcoholic, I suppose.

8 posted on 08/25/2010 9:00:46 AM PDT by gundog (Why is it that useful idiots remain idiots long after they've exhausted their usefulness?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gundog

depends on what the meaning of addict is. I suppose.

only you can answer that for yourself.


9 posted on 08/25/2010 9:07:11 AM PDT by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rahbert

I’m sure that thousands of people just outright lie on the 4473 anyway. It’s not an honesty test...it’s a matter of what the Feds can prove, or will bother to pursue. Remember the Clinton claim that 250,000,000 felons had been stopped from buying weapons? Number of prosecutions: 8. These people were standing at the counter with a freshly signed federal document with a felony penalty for lying, and they’re just told to go away...without a gun, or maybe the girlfriend will come in and do the paperwork tomorrow.


10 posted on 08/25/2010 9:18:31 AM PDT by gundog (Why is it that useful idiots remain idiots long after they've exhausted their usefulness?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: gundog

Well, were I the sheriff, and aware that the applicant
was a potsmoker with an official potsmoker card, I’d err
on the side of caution and deny the permit, as he did.

Otherwize I might be talking to a delegation from the
BATFE instead of plaintiff’s counsel.


11 posted on 08/25/2010 9:57:23 AM PDT by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rahbert
Well, were I the sheriff, and aware that the applicant was a potsmoker with an official potsmoker card, I’d err on the side of caution and deny the permit, as he did.

Well, I guess that comes down to an interpretation of "shall issue." Oregon pot growers are allowed to keep firearms in their homes, so long as they are a certain distance from their plants. It's goofy, but it's legal.

12 posted on 08/25/2010 10:42:40 AM PDT by gundog (Why is it that useful idiots remain idiots long after they've exhausted their usefulness?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Rio

Winters is a great sheriff.

Why the hell should Bob Hunter, the leftist editor of the Trib, be allowed to know and possibly print, the names of CCW holders in Oregon?

He fought the valiant fight.

As an aside, the legislature last year came very close to passing a bill that would restrict groups finding out who owns CCW’s, and one creepy, liberal senator from Bend squashed the whole thing.

I notice the Trib’s not suing for the names of AIDS patients, or illegal aliens, or pot-growers and users, or people with sexually transmitted diseases...no, he just wants to know who owns guns and carries them.

Good for you, Sheriff Winters!

Ed
Grants Pass


13 posted on 08/25/2010 4:43:33 PM PDT by Sir_Ed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson