I doubt it. They used the fragmentary DNA info from a Neandertal as a “reference” for their approach to “calculating” the rate of change, meaning this “study” is bogged down in exactly the same way as previous “studies”.
33 posted on 09/04/2010 12:04:59 PM PDT by SunkenCiv
(Democratic Underground... matters are worse, as their latest fund drive has come up short...)