Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Little Bill; SunkenCiv
if the invading army was from Uruk, did they kill their own people? If so why?

Fair question, as is: why did Sherman burn 'from Atlanta to the sea'; or why did the British burn Washington?

Civil wars and rebellions and their aftermaths somehow seem to have a way of being 'people killing their 'own' people'...can't imaging how that comes about, but it may be an answer to look for here. *<];-)

I also read the original, and then, as well as now, am intrigued by the 'clay bullets', as if the Middle East doesn't have enough stones to use. Never seems to be any shortage for the Palis to throw at Joooz; or Muslims to use for stoning women.

17 posted on 09/24/2010 7:05:43 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (Made in America, by proud American citizens, in 1946.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ApplegateRanch
am intrigued by the 'clay bullets', as if the Middle East doesn't have enough stones to use.

Quite simple. Standard shape, size and weight from a mold increases accuracy and thus lethality over random stones. Lead "bullets" for slings, when those became available during Hellenistic times, worked even better.

18 posted on 09/24/2010 7:12:17 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: ApplegateRanch

Clay bullets are lighter than stones, and more reliable (because they are manufactured, they have a regular shape and size). Sling weapons were enormously popular.


22 posted on 09/24/2010 8:26:47 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Democratic Underground... matters are worse, as their latest fund drive has come up short...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson