[Non-Sequitur]

Not this again. Do a Google search, why don't ya?

Both Obama's have law licenses. Both have voluntarily had their licenses put in an inactive status. This is not uncommon for attorneys who are working in positions where they are not practicing law because it means they don't have to keep up with the continuing legal education requirements. Unlike Clinton, their licenses were not taken away from them, they were not disbarred or suspended. This issue has been covered over and over again. There are a whole lot of things to be critical of both Obama's over but this isn't one of them.

[Diogenesis]

Non-Sequitur. Hi.

How normal at FR to see a RomneyBOT such as you eager
to defend Obama.

No law licence? RomneyBOT defends.

No birth certificate? RomneyBOT defends.

TARP? RomneyBOT defends.

ObamaCARE. RomneyBOT defends.

Hmmmmmmmm. mmmmm. mmmmm.

[Free America52]

‘Logical fallacy’ right on cue - back to defend his idols - the Obama’s!

[exit82]

Both Obama's have law licenses. Both have voluntarily had their licenses put in an inactive status. This is not uncommon for attorneys who are working in positions where they are not practicing law because it means they don't have to keep up with the continuing legal education requirements.

Sounds innocuous enough to you, doesn't it?

But the facts are different. Looks like there was a disciplinary action about to be handed down on Michelle, so she "voluntarily surrendered" her license, which dovetails into the "not-the-whole-truth" narrative you just described.

Then you must ask yourself--why? Why would you surrender a law license only 4 years after obtaining it?Especially when you are in a prestigious Chicago law firm?

It would seem that in the legal profession, that is the equivalent of surfer's wipeout, self induced or not.

Like all of the Obamas' records, the slate has ever been sanitized, as in this "Google" version you posted,or has been wiped clean.

The purpose of which is to obscur, deflect, and obsfucate.

But the truth will come out.

[Shimmer1]

You would say that, you’re only here to defend Obama. Besides that, you’re lying about this subject.
But that’s not unusual, is it.

[Lawgvr1955]

Illinois had no continuing legal education for lawyers at the time the Obama’s “gave up” their law licenses. Illinois began requiring mandatory continuing education for lawyers around 2005 or so.

[BluH2o]

This is not uncommon for attorneys who are working in positions where they are not practicing law because it means they don't have to keep up with the continuing legal education requirements.

Really? Michelle Obama takes and passes (?) the Illinois bar exam then just four years later walks away, very unlikely scenario.