[battousai]

The pit bull breed should be destroyed. People are more important than animals and not a day goes by without humans being injured or even killed by these dogs.

Its not the dog so much as the owners, its the same argument liberals use to grab guns, any dog can be vicious if not cared for properly.

I am not a dog owner and would not want a pitbul even if I were, but I don't like the knee jerk reaction that somethng should be banned, because it can so easily be turned around to then ban things we do hold dear. Just like what is happening in San Fran with the Happy Meal toys.

[brytlea]

You can talk until you are blue in the face to people who want to kill the entire breed (or anything that vaguely resembles what they think might be a pit bull).
This is a sad story, but as with virtually all of these stories the real issue is a dog or dogs not under the control of the owner.

[wardaddy]

ts the same argument liberals use to grab gun

just a heads up but most freepers believe what they want to believe and don't let truth or consistency hamper them

austere as the forum is, it's still comprised of hominids..in most cases

[762X51]

The gun control/dog control comparison often comes up when someone suggests banning or killing the breed. The pro-dog side compares the banning or killing of the breed to gun banning but they usually entirely miss, intentional or not, the main fact; guns are inanimate objects INCAPABLE of harm without human input, dogs ARE NOT. Guns and animals are not in ANY WAY comparable!

[Salamander]

“Just like what is happening in San Fran with the Happy Meal toys.”

?

[steveo]

No where in the Constitution is there a right to own dogs.

[goat granny]

The majority of Calif. keeps voting in nut cases so I don’t feel sorry for them....hope the gov. of calif. bans breathing by all liberals, now thats a law I could support..