Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In 150 Words: Christmas Day Bomber Proves TSA Wrong
www.yossigestetner.com ^ | 11/18/2010 | Yossi Gestetner

Posted on 11/18/2010 10:41:27 AM PST by goods

The Christmas Day Bomber, who had powder in his underpants, could have been stopped a year ago. No, not because he is Muslim; I am against Religious and Racial Profiling. But the fact that he once was on a terror watch list; arrived at airport with not much carryon luggage; and bought with cash a one-way ticket to fly via a passport with a history of being in rouge countries, should have given a perfect profile that he may be a terrorist, and thus being stopped. – If only Reasonable Profiling had been in place.

However, had he arrived at the European airport with the current TSA rules, he would have a huge chance of not being pulled for a screening because we don’t use Reasonable Profiling. Instead, we treat everyone as equal suspects – thus enabling more attacks to take place.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: nagropertano; tsa; tsapervs
Didnt TSA Boss say yesterday that Chritmas Bomber is THE reason for TSA rules?
1 posted on 11/18/2010 10:41:36 AM PST by goods
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: goods

I would like to recommend this as required reading?


2 posted on 11/18/2010 10:46:12 AM PST by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goods

I would like to recommend this as required reading.

I meant to not pose this as a question.

At some point the terrorists are going to get one in and bring down a plane. It’s a matter of time. The infiltration method will be convoluted, or it may be ordinary. Either way, security safeguards are going to be so onerous that they will not be implemented.

At that point, we will expect risk of death by terrorist in the same vein as risk by pilot error, control system error, unusual weather event, faulting maintenance etc. We’re not going to shut down this wonderful method of getting around and we have to accept the risk.

However, if security precautions do become onerous enough, this transportation system will die. This is a WOT battle front and as the OP states, we are not fighting as effectively as we can.


3 posted on 11/18/2010 10:57:06 AM PST by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goods

That’s way too simple for Janet Nagropertano to understand.


4 posted on 11/18/2010 11:20:26 AM PST by Palladin (Bristol Palin is America's Sweetheart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cicero2k
The issue is how security in this country is conducted. If I may be allowed an analogy.

You have an average sized room that a rat must cross to get to some “rat chow” at the far end. Our current security system is like a maze that we create to make it harder for the rat to get to his prize. Until one day we realize that the rat has learned the current maze, so we make it more complex and burdensome. A few hours, days, weeks later, we find that, surprise surprise, the rat has figured out how to make it past this maze as well.

The kicker is that not only has the rat figured how to make it through the maze, all the obstacles in place have made it almost impossible for everyone else to make it through the room as well. Unless you are a female rat...in that case the designers of the maze will hand carry the female rat to the prize via a hallway that avoids the maze altogether.

So what is the solution?

I suggest we remove the maze altogether and put a few cats or terriers in the empty room and then release the rat to try to make it to the other side. In this case, private airport security firms, (private firms are easier to sue if they overstep their bounds, than the government), with personnel trained in El-Al style counter terrorist profiling, are the cats and dogs I am referring to.

You will notice that the cats and dogs will pretty much ignore anyone and everything...until a rat tries to make it through the room. In short order it will be snap, snap, shake, shake...and no more rat.

Just my idea/opinion.

As an after though, another poster, in another thread made the following point. When did it become OK for federal employees to touch/search U.S. citizens in a manner that is prohibited to our soldiers when searching captured Taliban?

5 posted on 11/18/2010 11:36:06 AM PST by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson