Skip to comments.
Dog owners oppose park plans
Marin Scope ^
| March 9 2011
| Jessica Mullins
Posted on 03/10/2011 7:58:22 AM PST by Immerito
Some southern Marin pet owners are outraged by a proposed plan that would change rules for dogs in the Marin Headlands, banning them at some spots and requiring leashes at others.
In January, Golden Gate National Recreational Area officials released a hefty 2,400-page proposal on how the federal parkland can update its dog management plan, which has been unchanged for more than 30 years.
In Marin, the more contentious suggestions are to ban dogs at Muir Beach and on some hiking trails, while requiring them to be leashed on other Marin Headlands trails. Some frequenters of Rodeo Beach were relieved to see the only proposed change was to require leashes on a bridge connecting the beach to the road.
Park officials have said dog management is needed to help preserve the parks and mitigate dog-related controversy and safety issues.
(Excerpt) Read more at marinscope.com ...
TOPICS: Pets/Animals
KEYWORDS: california; dog; doggieping; marin
1
posted on
03/10/2011 7:58:30 AM PST
by
Immerito
To: Joe 6-pack
2
posted on
03/10/2011 8:00:02 AM PST
by
Immerito
(Reading Through the Bible in 90 Days)
To: AnAmericanMother; Titan Magroyne; Badeye; apackof2; Shannon; SandRat; arbooz; potlatch; metmom; ...
WOOOF!
The Doggie Ping list is for FReepers who would like to be notified of threads relating to all things canid. If you would like to join the Doggie Ping Pack (or be unleashed from it), FReemail me.
3
posted on
03/10/2011 8:29:17 AM PST
by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
To: Immerito
and requiring leashes at othersExcellent idea
4
posted on
03/10/2011 8:35:27 AM PST
by
from occupied ga
(Your most dangerous enemy is your own government,)
To: Immerito
Politicians, bureaucrats, political appointees, government hacks, knuckle-dragging “regulators”, and other pink-panty putzs rule against pets AT THEIR PERIL!!
5
posted on
03/10/2011 9:00:28 AM PST
by
GoldenPup
To: Immerito
Poor, ickle, Libtards finally discover environmental regs are NOT ‘inherently good’!
PITY ! !
6
posted on
03/10/2011 9:16:49 AM PST
by
GladesGuru
(In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principles,)
To: GoldenPup
Looks like this controversy came about primarily because the irresponsible dog owners annoyed a sufficient percentage of the non-dog-owning public who frequented the park.
7
posted on
03/10/2011 10:27:28 AM PST
by
Immerito
(Reading Through the Bible in 90 Days)
To: Immerito
"....and mitigate dog-related controversy...."
Translation: To shut up miserable animal-hating crabby folks who got nuttin' better to do than complain and moan about something - usually others enjoying themselves.
You couldn't pay me to live anywhere in the People's Republic of Kalifornistan.
8
posted on
03/10/2011 10:44:00 AM PST
by
Emperor Palpatine
(Tosca, mi fai dimenticare Iddio!!!)
To: Immerito
9
posted on
03/10/2011 3:19:18 PM PST
by
divine_moment_of_facts
(Give me Liberty.. or I'll get up and get it for myself!)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson