Posted on 05/13/2011 2:53:37 PM PDT by JimBianchi11
http://www.nwitimes.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/article_ec169697-a19e-525f-a532-81b3df229697.html
Their state supreme court ruled you can not stop a police officer from illegally entering your home. They can enter for any reason, no warrant, without pause.
You must let them enter and seek remedy in the courts, if the entry is in fact illegal....
Hopefully, quickly,
3-2. Do you know what parties the judges are affiliated with, if any?
Also, the article ends by mentioning another decision, saying that police do not need a judge’s permission to search a house.
This really is blatantly unconstitutional.
Um, wow. I cannot think of any SCOTUS Justice who won’t drop-kick this decision into the dust bin of history.
Except maybe Sotomayor. Don’t know squat about her jurisprudence.
I’m glad that I don’t sing My Homes in Indiana. Is this where the Nazi’s went maybe Argentina was a myth?
I’m betting SCOTUS will support this. The system has been wanting to strip the rights of Americans away for quite a while and they have found pretext to doing so.
That's the FR bootlickers popping woodies under their computer tables.
Dogs hit hardest by this ruling.
So, you want to translate what you just said?
Did they also say we should strip naked and bend over for them?
They can enter but they may leave in a body bag!
This is a 10 minute case for the Supremes, a clear violation of the 4th.
And since the cops and courts now work hand in glove, you have two chances at getting relief [justice]. Slim and none.
Extraordinary police action gets some FReepers sexually aroused.
1) This story is a duplicate post: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2719318/posts
2) You changed the title and posted it separately.
3) Under the original thread, the story was debunked.
3a) the guy’s wife was kicking him out. He was throwing things around the place, and she called 911.
3b) When cop arrived, she said that the guy was leaving so the cop wasn’t needed, but the guy started yelling and threatened the cop.
3c) The cop tried to go inside to where she was. She was inside telling the husband to let the cop through while the husband tried to block the doorway.
The claims that this story makes are ridiculous.
AMEN to that.
Yes. It's a nobrainer. That's why I am worried.
There was NO ILLEGAL ENTRY by police.
In fact, there seems to have been a LEGAL ENTRY where a policeman answered a 911 call by a lady living in an apartment. She and her man had broken up. He was moving out. She was helping him move out. Apparently he threatened her or something, so while she was indoors picking up more stuff for him SHE CALLED THE COPS, who responded, and everybody ended up in HER apartment!.
The Supreme Court decision has no logical linkage to the facts of the case. It's highly unlikely any district court judge in Indiana will allow a reference to it to be used in court ~ it would be too confusing, particularly if a legal or illegal entry with or without a warrant were involved.
It's nutso stuff ~ what happens when you suck down too much Ecstasy or Blue Ice.
I sure hope so. I'm thinking, another one bites the dust.
I remember reading about a different tactic. The police were sending informants to houses, from where they dialed 9-1-1. Instant probable cause.
You poor naïve bastard, you really believe the courts actually support the constitution and all inalienable rights contained within it, don’t you?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.