Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ckilmer; Renfield

Good point. Combined with the botanical and other evidence though, which is from before the period of South American contact I think you’re referring to (post-Columbus?), this can’t be discarded.

From the article at the link: “Because most of Thorsby’s volunteers came from one extended family, he was able to work out when the HLA genes entered their lineage. The most probable first known carrier was a woman named Maria Aquala, born in 1846. Crucially, that was before the slave traders arrived in the 1860s and began interbreeding with the islanders.”

As an aside, I think ‘intermarrying’ would have been a better choice of word in the article.


6 posted on 06/09/2011 10:37:55 AM PDT by OldNewYork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: OldNewYork

Given that slavers aren’t known for marrying their prey, I suggest interbreeding is exactly the right term.

Vulgar, but then the practice of slavery is extremely vulgar in reality.


7 posted on 06/09/2011 1:41:08 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson