Of course not. And I didn't. I posted hundreds of comments and some articles on the issue during Trump.
After seeing that Congress could have cared less about Constitutional Eligibility, I finally got off the issue.
I just don't think it should be an election issue. It's an issue that should have been resolved before the first election and again before this election.
Should we go back to this issue after the election?
Hell yeah. Whether he wins or not. It will be revisited.
And it's still being looked into as we speak. I just don't think it would benefit us to make it an election issue. And I spent weeks thinking about it.
It's a constitutional issue.
I agree with you that it's a "constitutional issue". Don't you think we should make the CONSTITUTION a huge issue in the election? As therein lies the fact that so many of the problems we are facing now are due to not following the constitution.
“It’s a constitutional issue.”
Yep, and I think that Tom Sowell (I am a fan) would agree that having an ineligible usurper occupying the White House in violation of Article II Section I, Clause V of the Constitution is a “Big Effing Deal.” Of course, since we (still) haven’t seen definitive birth documentation on the guy, he could in fact be eligible; it’s then just that every other aspect of his life narrative is shown to be a lie. Somebody’s tag line that I’ve seen on FR went something like “Obama may not be a Natural Born Citizen, but he’s certainly a Natural Born Liar.” Perfect.