Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv

That’s why knights were armored horsemen - heavy lancers.

Foot soldiers wore less armor - helmet, breast and back, and tassets.


6 posted on 08/27/2011 6:45:40 AM PDT by Little Ray (FOR the best Conservative in the Primary; AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Little Ray
That’s why knights were armored horsemen - heavy lancers.

True. However, by Agincort the French had a century of experience that heavy cavalry assaults against entrenched bowmen was just a way of dying tired. Turns out horses with arrows in them become a little hard to control.

The English knights had, in these battles, fought on foot.

So the French decided the answer was for them also to fight on foot.

Apparently not realizing that standing and waiting means the English knights will be a little fresher than the Frenchies will after slogging thru a half mile of mud.

15 posted on 08/27/2011 6:53:05 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson