Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Deadly Myth: Women, Handguns, and Self-Defense (Violence Policy Center BS)
violence policy center ^

Posted on 10/11/2011 4:39:57 AM PDT by RC one

In the late 1980s, the gun industry began targeting women to counter slumping handgun sales among its primary market of white males. The false message delivered by gunmakers was clear: the greatest threat posed to a woman was an attack by a stranger and, the best form of protection a woman could rely upon was a handgun.

Much to the disappointment and consternation of the gun industry, these efforts for the most part have failed. A 1995 study by the National Opinion Research Center (NORC) conducted by Tom Smith and Robert J. Smith found that handgun ownership among women was, and remains, uncommon. This study found any fluctuations in the percentage of women who owned handguns to be statistically insignificant.

The 1996 study Guns in America found that only 6.6 percent of adult American women owned a handgun—less than one out of every 10 women. But of these women, nearly 85 percent owned their handguns for self-defense—a figure that offers gunmakers continual hope in their marketing endeavors. Yet how often are handguns actually used by women to kill in self-defense? The answer, as revealed by unpublished Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) data, is hardly ever. Women were murdered with handguns more than 1,200 times in 1998 alone. As these numbers reveal, handguns don't offer protection for women, but instead guarantee peril.

In 1998, for every time a woman used a handgun to kill in self-defense, 101 women were murdered with a handgun.

Despite the promises of gun-industry advertising, a woman is far more likely to be the victim of a handgun homicide than to use a handgun in a justifiable homicide. In 1998, handguns were used to murder 1,209 women. That same year, 12 women used handguns to kill in self-defense.

When a woman did use a handgun to kill in self-defense, it was usually against someone she knew, not against a stranger. Of the 12 handgun self-defense killings by women reported to the FBI in 1998, eight involved attackers known to the woman, while only four involved strangers.

All the attackers that the women justifiably killed were males, as were an overwhelming number of offenders in female handgun homicides. For the majority of both justifiable and criminal homicides, both the shooter and the victim were of the same race.

In 1998, for every time a woman used a handgun to kill a stranger in self-defense, 302 woman were murdered with a handgun.


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: banglist; corruption; democrats; fraud; liberalfascism; vpc; vpccorruption
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
So, I'm looking for a good self defense pistol for my girlfriend (input would be appreciated) and I come across this VPC statement regarding women, handguns, and violence. I found it to be an incredibly useless bit of information that clearly illustrates the warped "logic" and the contorted supporting statistics used by the anti-gunners to push their agenda onto Americans. In one paragraph they state that "to the chagrin of the gun makers, less than 1 out of 10 women owns a gun for self defense" and in a following paragraph, they state that "In 1998, for every time a woman used a handgun to kill in self-defense, 101 women were murdered with a handgun" and "In 1998, for every time a woman used a handgun to kill a stranger in self-defense, 302 woman were murdered with a handgun" and they then go on to use this as an argument for why women shouldn't buy a handgun for self defense, because "statistics" show that they are more likely to be murdered by a handgun than use a handgun for self defense. Well it seems pretty obvious to me that those statistics would reverse themselves if more women owned handguns for self defense. It also seems to me that these anti-gunners, by twisting the truth around their agenda, are literally sacrificing the lives of innocent women in order to disarm this country and that is just disgusting. So, please excuse my rant and FUVPC. any freepers have any thoughts on a good handgun for self defense for a woman. .357 hurts her hands too much and I'm afraid a complicated semi-auto wouldn't suit her. I also think a Glock is out of the question due to the lack of an actual safety switch.
1 posted on 10/11/2011 4:40:03 AM PDT by RC one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RC one

Try a Beretta PX4 subcompact 9mm


2 posted on 10/11/2011 4:45:52 AM PDT by tgusa (Gun control: deep breath, sight alignment, squeeze the trigger......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tgusa

that does look a good option.


3 posted on 10/11/2011 4:50:32 AM PDT by RC one (Voting isn't a simple act of civic duty anymore, it's a complex act of civil war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RC one

A S&W J-Frame .357 with Pachmyer grips is quite pain free, and very effective. The stock grips don’t soften the heavy loads. Or, there’s always a .38 snubby.


4 posted on 10/11/2011 4:50:48 AM PDT by pingman (Durn tootin'; I like Glock shootin'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pingman

yeah, she shot two rounds out of my model 340 M&P in .357 and said no thanks. That thing hurts my hands. .38s would be an option though.


5 posted on 10/11/2011 4:55:17 AM PDT by RC one (Voting isn't a simple act of civic duty anymore, it's a complex act of civil war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RC one
My wife is petite...5-0, 100lbs.Most polymer frame guns hurt her hand.So, when Sig came out with a metal frame .380 she tried it & fell in love with it. The Sig P238 is a great gun. Check it out for yourself.

You'll get a lot of great advice here, but the best advice is to have your girl try the gun first.

6 posted on 10/11/2011 4:58:53 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tgusa
Women were murdered with handguns more than 1,200 times in 1998 alone. As these numbers reveal, handguns don't offer protection for women, but instead guarantee peril.

So, these lying a-holes want you to believe that they were murdered with their OWN gun, hmmm?

7 posted on 10/11/2011 5:01:24 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

I may be killed by my gun, but you will have to beat me to death with it, because it is going to be empty. ——Clint Smith


8 posted on 10/11/2011 5:10:29 AM PDT by occamrzr06 (One day this will all make sense!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RC one

got any more current statistics?


9 posted on 10/11/2011 5:12:48 AM PDT by absolootezer0 (2x divorced tattooed pierced harley hatin meghan mccain luvin' REAL beer drinkin' smoker ..what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC one

I can only speak as a female. One, I commend you for wanting to teach your girlfriend how to shoot. Second, bring her to a range and let her try out different guns. She will find one that feels comfortable to her. Her first gun selection provides her the opportunity to practice with the gun and get use to it. Even a snub nose .38 (which you may laugh at) may feel more comfortable to her than one you may like. Third, practice, practice, practice. Not sure if this helps at all but that is my two cents!


10 posted on 10/11/2011 5:14:35 AM PDT by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

That looks acceptable but the more I look at the beretta PX4 storm, the more I lean towards it. It has adjustable backstraps for a more custom hand fit and a lower rail for a laser or flashlight. plus its single/double action with deckcoker and manual safety- and all for less than 600 bucks. Cant say much bad about either Beretta or Sig when it comes to semi-autos either.


11 posted on 10/11/2011 5:18:20 AM PDT by RC one (Voting isn't a simple act of civic duty anymore, it's a complex act of civil war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

That’s what they want your to think. The fact that’s they didn’t specificly connect the two statistics make it clear that’s the number of women murdered have nothing to do with whether they had a gun or not. Quite likely they know that many died for lack of a gun. They also ignore how often simply drawing a gun can nip trouble in the bud without having to kill.


12 posted on 10/11/2011 5:18:31 AM PDT by LevinFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RC one
In 1998, handguns were used to murder 1,209 women. That same year, 12 women used handguns to kill in self-defense.

It would be asking too much for the VPC to say "Of the 1209 murdered women, XXX (number) owned a handgun. I don't know the answer, but it is probably close to ZIP. If those 1209 women had each owned a gun, I'm betting a lot of them would be alive today. Of course none of this occurs (or matters) to the morons at VPC.

13 posted on 10/11/2011 5:21:33 AM PDT by deoetdoctrinae (Gun-Free zones are playgrounds for felons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0

no, I just came across that site and it irked me plus I wanted to post a vanity about a handgun for my girlfriend so two ideas merged. I truly despise the VPC. They would have been the first group to start providing statistics about US gun dealers arming the cartels and getting innocent people killed and so on so forth. probably bought and paid for by George Soros.


14 posted on 10/11/2011 5:21:52 AM PDT by RC one (Voting isn't a simple act of civic duty anymore, it's a complex act of civil war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: momtothree

As a female pistol instructor, I second your comment.


15 posted on 10/11/2011 5:27:20 AM PDT by ProfoundBabe ("Every real thought on every real subject knocks the wind out of somebody or other." - OW Holmes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RC one

Not one argument seems to follow logically from another. This author is the prince of Non Sequitur.


16 posted on 10/11/2011 5:31:50 AM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's "Economics In One Lesson.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC one

S&W Model 10 or 64.
Both .38 Specials

Simple, reliable, fits their hands, smooth trigger.

Easy to get follow-up shots back on target.

Semi-autos require significantly more range and practice time.


17 posted on 10/11/2011 5:37:26 AM PDT by G Larry (I dream of a day when a man is judged by the content of his character)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LevinFan
That’s what they want your to think. The fact that’s they didn’t specificly connect the two statistics make it clear that’s the number of women murdered have nothing to do with whether they had a gun or not. Quite likely they know that many died for lack of a gun. They also ignore how often simply drawing a gun can nip trouble in the bud without having to kill.

You make an excellent point. They appear to have twisted both logic and statistics to "prove" a point.

For example, they talk about women buying guns as protection from strangers, yet many are killed by people they know. While some of us may well be concerned about strangers- say, for example, a businesswoman who travels alone extensively- I do know and have known women who purchased a firearm for protection from people they did know, too well, such as ex-husbands and boyfriends. Self-protection is self-protection, regardless of whether or not you know your attacker.

More, as LevinFan points out, some or many of the women who died might not have done so had they been armed. As LevinFan also points out, the deterrent value of being armed does not necessarily depend on killing someone. A shot may not need to be fired at all to deter an attack.

It would also be interesting to see more recent statistics, as I'd bet that the numbers of female gun owners has changed since 1998.

To the original poster: momofthree gave excellent advice. Let your girlfriend try out a variety of firearms until she finds something that she really likes, that feels good in her hands and that she is not afraid of. I favor a Glock myself, so let her give a smaller Glock a try as well. If she is not comfortable with whatever she gets, she will not be willing to practice with it, and she has to practice for it to be any use to her.

18 posted on 10/11/2011 5:40:09 AM PDT by susannah59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RC one
This thread has just added to the FreeRepublic "bang list" (firearms interest list) by adding the keyword "banglist".

Any time a firearms-related thread is created on FreeRepublic, please be sure to add the "banglist" keyword to it so that interested FReepers don't miss it. Just a suggestion.

Let Freedom Ring,

Gun Facts v5.1!

Click the pic to go to the Gun Facts v5.1 download page!

19 posted on 10/11/2011 5:40:26 AM PDT by Joe Brower (Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC one
Just a thought, but IF this is going to be her carry gun, and IF she decides to go with a revolver, you might want to encourage going with something with a concealed hammer. One less thing to snag when pulling from purse or pocket in a high stress situation.

Just my two ¢s worth.

20 posted on 10/11/2011 5:40:44 AM PDT by deoetdoctrinae (Gun-Free zones are playgrounds for felons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson