The fifth or sixth such announcement we've seen in the last few years. This one has a little more details... for those interested.
To: LibWhacker
it’s hard to build radar that can penetrate walls well enough to show what’s happening behind. Of course there is no ill health effect suffered by the target victim, right?
2 posted on
10/18/2011 4:30:02 PM PDT by
a fool in paradise
('Are now or have you ever been a member of the tea party?' is NOT a legitimate debate question.)
To: LibWhacker
They may have done some interesting things signal-processing-wise to advance the state-of-the-art but the basic idea has been around as a proven capability for at least 25 years and probably longer.
To: LibWhacker
Tom Clancey beat them all to it... or we have had it for years.
LLS
4 posted on
10/18/2011 4:50:18 PM PDT by
LibLieSlayer
("Americans are hungry to feel once again a sense of mission and greatness." Ronaldo Magnus)
To: LibWhacker
Hmm. In the old days if we wanted to look through a wall, we just used a window...
5 posted on
10/18/2011 9:31:34 PM PDT by
CPONav
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson