Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MoJoWork_n
I wasn't aware that Columbus cut down any trees let alone that many. The Pilgrims found cleared land that was form a plague that killed the natives in the are where they settled so they are not the ones that cut all the forests down. The land was not completely cleared in the 1800’s for the farmers in the Midwest. There are more trees in the Rockies than there were when Columbus came over. How can a “scientist” get so many things wrong?
21 posted on 10/21/2011 11:31:42 AM PDT by mountainlion (I am voting for Sarah after getting screwed again by the DC Thugs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mountainlion

No, you got the point of the article wrong.

It was *more* trees that sucked more CO2 out of the atmosphere, that the people advancing this theory say could be linked to the decreased CO2 in the ice in Antarctica, that suggests the drop in temperatures during the Little Ice Age may have had a human origin.

Columbus didn’t cut down NO trees.


27 posted on 10/21/2011 12:22:26 PM PDT by MoJoWork_n (We don't know what it is we don't know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson