Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Herman Cain in New Interview: Abortion Should Not be Legal
LifeNews.com ^ | October 21, 2011 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 10/21/2011 12:45:12 PM PDT by julieee

Herman Cain in New Interview: Abortion Should Not be Legal

Washington, DC -- Herman Cain has given a new interview in which he explains his pro-life views on abortion and gives some insight as to why he made some "pro-choice" sounding comments in a CNN interview this week.

http://www.lifenews.com/2011/10/21/herman-cain-in-new-interview-abortion-should-not-be-legal/

(Excerpt) Read more at lifenews.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: abortion; arrestwomen; hermancain; interview; outlaws; prison; prolife; prosecutewomen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 10/21/2011 12:45:19 PM PDT by julieee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: julieee

You need to listen to the interview and not get your news second hand. Cain is NOT pro abortion.


2 posted on 10/21/2011 12:48:31 PM PDT by Rooivalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rooivalk

I’m going to lobby for a “article to posting ratio requirement”.

“some” people post article after article and _never_ stick around to address comments on those articles.


3 posted on 10/21/2011 12:51:04 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: julieee

Look, I am solidly in Cain’s camp but truth is he had a redo on this and he still screwed it up. He had his chance to say that the choice is adoption or rearing the rape child and not abortion. He clearly leaves the impression that families have the choice for abortion. Personally I am more concerned about the economy and my main focus remains on Cain to solve that.


4 posted on 10/21/2011 12:51:11 PM PDT by New Jersey Realist (America: home of the free because of the brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee

This is what he has said all along. People (egged on by the media) have been twisting his statements to make him appear pro-abortion. He has been a lifelong strong pro-life champion.


5 posted on 10/21/2011 12:51:32 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: New Jersey Realist

Except he didn’t say that. Look at what he was responding to, Morgan changed the question to be about ‘raising’ the child, not aborting it. Cain even called Morgan out right then on changing the subject so it was apparent that Cain realized he was answering a question about raising, not about aborting.


6 posted on 10/21/2011 12:53:19 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: julieee

Cain is pro choice and he chooses life over death like some other supposed “pro choice” types.


7 posted on 10/21/2011 12:53:27 PM PDT by LottieDah (If only those who speak so eloquently on behalf of animals would do so on behalf of the unborn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

>>> He has been a lifelong strong pro-life champion. >>>

He has, and that’s beyond reproach. What is also true is that this issue is not the reason he is running for President. It just is not. And IMO, that’s fine too.

If he appoints justices along the lines of Clarence Thomas - which he has said he would do - then he will be doing all a President can do vis a vis abortion. The “Santorum” notion that our political leaders must emphasize these issues is just not what Cain believes. Nor do I.


8 posted on 10/21/2011 12:55:22 PM PDT by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

[ If he appoints justices along the lines of Clarence Thomas - which he has said he would do - then he will be doing all a President can do vis a vis abortion. The “Santorum” notion that our political leaders must emphasize these issues is just not what Cain believes. Nor do I ]

NAILED IT


9 posted on 10/21/2011 1:02:27 PM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: New Jersey Realist
Personally I am more concerned about the economy and my main focus remains on Cain to solve that.

Same here. The simple reality is that regardless of what Cain or any other candidate has to say about abortion, there's very little they can actually do about it except to nominate conservatives to the Supreme Court. I have no reason to believe that Cain would not nominate a conservative, therefore this is a non-issue for me right now - the economy is the giant meteorite blotting out the sky.
10 posted on 10/21/2011 1:07:19 PM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: julieee

Herman Cain on Abortion
http://www.ontheissues.org/2012/Herman_Cain_Abortion.htm

African American Businessman Spends 1M to Urge Blacks to Vote Pro-Life (2006)
http://www.lifenews.com/2006/09/13/nat-2583/

Herman Cain Reaffirms Commitment to Pro-Life Principles
http://secure.campaigner.com/Campaigner/Public/t.show?LVMF—8Oz3-WCSgU7

Cain Picks Clarence Thomas as Model for Supreme Court Pick
http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/232604/20111017/herman-cain-clarence-thomas-supreme-court.htm

2004 - Herman Cain blasts Roe v. Wade (Free Republic - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-gop/1063707/posts

And Alveda King affirmed on Facebook that she knew and worked with Cain on Pro-life issues over the years and testifies that he is Prolife

Herman Cain: Defund Racist Planned Parenthood Abortion Biz
http://www.lifenews.com/2011/01/18/herman-cain-defund-racist-planned-parenthood-abortion-biz/

Herman Cain: Planned Parenthood Should Be Called ‘Planned Genocide’
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/03/herman-cain-planned-parenthood-should-be-called-planned-genocide.php

Herman Cain was endorsed by the Georgia Right-To-Life PAC in the 2004 US Senate GOP primary. Cain’s primary challenger from 2004, Johnny Isakson, had a pro-choice streak in his voting record and it was the reason why GRTL endorsed him.

Life, liberty & pursuit of happiness starts with unborn life
The Founding Fathers got it right. The Founding Fathers got it right because of those fundamental principles: life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. They also got it in the right order. That wasn’t an accident. Their vision meant that you could pursue happiness in America as long as you don’t infringe upon the liberties of somebody else. And you can pursue all the liberties that you want as long as you don’t infringe upon the life of anybody else. And that starts with the life of the unborn.
Source: , May 1, 2011

Defund Planned Parenthood; intent was to kill black babies
I absolutely would defund Planned Parenthood—not because I don’t believe in planning parenthood, [but because] Planned Parenthood as an organization is an absolute farce on the American people.

People who know the history of Margaret Sanger, who started Planned Parenthood, they know that the intention was not to help young women who get pregnant to plan their parenthood. No—it was a sham to be able to kill black babies.
Source: Interview on the Bryan Fischer radio show , Jan 18, 2011

Life begins at conception, period
I believe that life begins at conception, period. And that means that I will have to see enough evidence that someone I would appoint shares that same view. I believe that the current Supreme Court is leaning too much to the liberal side.

I’m a Christian, I’ve been a Christian all my life. I’ve been a believer in the Bible since I was 10 years old. I’m very active in my church, and there is no way I would compromise my religious beliefs about the sanctity of life. And so it starts with, will they have demonstrated, in some of their other rulings, if they come from the federal judge bench, whether or not they also share that.

Because I believe that the principles that our Founding Fathers cherished, when they founded this country, and wrote the Declaration of Independence which inspired the Constitution, they were based upon biblical principles. I want to get back to those principles as president, if I run and get elected—not rewrite those documents.

ontheissues.org


11 posted on 10/21/2011 1:10:24 PM PDT by justsaynomore (Cain 2012 - http://teamcain.hermancain.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: New Jersey Realist

Sick of people making a big deal out of little nuanced things. Bottom line is he will nominate conservative judges and they make these decisions


12 posted on 10/21/2011 1:11:04 PM PDT by chevydude26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
then he will be doing all a President can do vis a vis abortion

BS...pardon my French.

I've had my fill of politicians who're nothing more than "pro-life" talkers - and more than my fill of "pro-lifers" telling us what can't be done.
13 posted on 10/21/2011 1:14:24 PM PDT by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LearsFool

For a “talker”, Cain sure does a lot of “walking”.

African American Businessman Spends 1M to Urge Blacks to Vote Pro-Life

http://www.lifenews.com/2006/09/13/nat-2583/


14 posted on 10/21/2011 1:17:48 PM PDT by Politicalmom (I am intrigued and open to the Bush administrationÂ’s amnesty proposal. -Rick Perry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: chevydude26
Bottom line is he will nominate conservative judges and they make these decisions

Again, BS...pardon my French.

Since when is the judicial branch superior to the other two? When it comes to defending helpless babies, I want a man of courage in the White House, not a buck-passer. YMMV.
15 posted on 10/21/2011 1:17:48 PM PDT by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

That’s what I’d heard about Cain, and what impressed me. I’m so tired of hearing so-called “pro-life” folks saying, “Oh well, all he can do to protect the helpless babies is to nominate judges.”

That’s a buck-passing coward’s excuse for not standing tall.


16 posted on 10/21/2011 1:21:12 PM PDT by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LearsFool

>> I’ve had my fill of politicians who’re nothing more than “pro-life” talkers - and more than my fill of “pro-lifers” telling us what can’t be done. >>

And I guess I would say I’ve had my fill of faux conservatives deciding which parts of the Constitution they want their candidate to follow and which to discard. Constitutionally, the appointment of judges who are originalists - meaning they will no doubt vote to over turn Roe V Wade - IS all a President can do. But that’s a HUGE PLUS. It’s not insignificant. That’s not a fake pro life position.

Judgeships are perhaps the single most important thing a President does as far as lasting impact is concerned. To pooh pooh that is to not understand our system or our Constitution or our reality.


17 posted on 10/21/2011 1:26:11 PM PDT by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: LearsFool

>>> That’s what I’d heard about Cain, and what impressed me. I’m so tired of hearing so-called “pro-life” folks saying, “Oh well, all he can do to protect the helpless babies is to nominate judges.”
That’s a buck-passing coward’s excuse for not standing tall.>>>

You have your apples and oranges mixed up. AS PRESIDENT, he will not be spending tax money to get African Americans to vote pro life. AS PRESIDENT all he can do is appoint the right judges. AS PRESIDENT AS PRESIDENT AS PRESIDENT — is different than as a private citizen.

Learn it live it love it.


18 posted on 10/21/2011 1:29:07 PM PDT by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: julieee

A different story from Cain on every issue almost every day. Now the left would give him the heat and he has to change his opinion yet again on abortion. Wait for a new opinion on abortion in the next few days.


19 posted on 10/21/2011 1:31:31 PM PDT by jgge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jgge
Probably not ~ Cain is pro-life. Has been, is now, and will be.

You, on the other hand probably aren't.

This is one of my make or break issues.

20 posted on 10/21/2011 1:36:47 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson