Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Smogger

I have to disagree. I see no difference between SCOTUS’ ruling that Joe can take my house to build a bigger one on what was my land for himself and the state taking your front yard you paid for and opening it to the public.


2 posted on 11/10/2011 9:55:14 AM PST by pabianice (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: pabianice

Huh? What they own and what they bought was a house on a public street with public parking.


4 posted on 11/10/2011 10:03:05 AM PST by heartwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

Apples and oranges. No one owns the states beaches and you certainly don’t own the roads that the taxpayers pay for! Not to mention the fact that the state has spend millions preventing beach erosion in these areas. There should be a $10K fine for putting up a fake no parking sign on a public right of way.


5 posted on 11/10/2011 10:04:36 AM PST by Smogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

Welcome to western civilization.

Property rights and real estate laws in modern America are largely based on centuries-old principals practiced in Europe.

The concept of riparian landowners *not* being permitted to deny access to major bodies of water is part of that.

In other words it’s against the law (as it always has and always should be) for these homeowners to keep the public away from the shoreline.


8 posted on 11/10/2011 10:49:43 AM PST by AAABEST (Et lux in tenebris lucet: et tenebrae eam non comprehenderunt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson