A gentle remindeer to always take "scientific theories" with a grain of salt.
1 posted on
03/30/2012 7:17:52 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
If you bother to read the whole article, you might find this to be a thoughtful and engaging story of unexpected discovery.
To: BenLurkin; SunkenCiv
I’m a little surprised that a 3 page article didn’t have any pictures of this remarkable find.
I’m also a little leery of articles of this type that are posted near April 1.
3 posted on
03/30/2012 7:56:40 PM PDT by
wildbill
(You're just jealous because the Voices talk only to me.)
To: BenLurkin
What over Stone Age creatures are still lurking out there unknown to science?
4 posted on
03/30/2012 7:57:25 PM PDT by
Inyo-Mono
(My greatest fear is that when I'm gone my wife will sell my guns for what I told her I paid for them)
To: BenLurkin
If the Eohippus was really the ancestor of the rhinoceros and tapir as well as the horse, our ancestors were smart to select the horse as the one to domesticate.
To: BenLurkin
The world is filled with wonders. We have only to look.
14 posted on
03/30/2012 8:40:48 PM PDT by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(Would you sing if someone sucked YOU up the vacuum cleaner hose?)
To: BenLurkin
15 posted on
03/30/2012 8:41:41 PM PDT by
redhead
(Alaska: Step out of the bus and into the food chain.)
To: BenLurkin
It’s too bad they didn’t take a picture of them. Or at least make a cave drawing.
22 posted on
03/31/2012 12:14:18 AM PDT by
TigersEye
(Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson