Constitution Party National Convention to Meet in Nashville (Starting today, Wednesday 18 April)

The Constitution Party ^ | 17 Apr 12 | CP

[Iscool]

LOL, no they're not. They support things like a protectionist trade police with high tariffs, a Ron Paul like foreign policy, etc.

You mean they want to get jobs back into the U.S., put Americans to work and build up the tax base and get millions of people off welfare???

Why that's disgusting...Romney nor Obama would ever suggest such a thing...

[ScottinVA]

Now what was it you were so heavily immersed in again? Oh, that's right; Complete, insignificant obscurity, with overtones of pointless grandiosity.

Thank you for your input. Bye.

[rarestia]

The "Constitution Party" is an anti-Israel John Birch Society/chr*stian dominionist front.

Could you link to any material to substantiate this? I'm checking out their party platform and there are no mentions of Israel (positive or negative). I'm a solid supporter of Israel, and I won't throw my hat into any political ring that doesn't support their right to exist.

[Carry_Okie]

Is the theme this year “Profiles In Irrelevancy,” or “Dare to Distract”?

For those of us who live in leftist dominated states (thanks to RINO boot-lickers like you Mr. BibChr Schwarzenegger-Tailer), the Constitution Party is a rational alternative when the Republican nominee has no chance.

[ScottinVA]

the Constitution Party is a rational alternative when the Republican nominee has no chance.

Absolutely.. that's why THIS year presents the opportunity to promote and build it.

[Iscool]

The "Constitution Party" is an anti-Israel John Birch Society/chr*stian dominionist front.

Wasn't aware of that...Guess I'll have to reconsider my new affiliation...

[Longbow1969]

Tariff’s and isolationism isn’t going to be a winner.

The Constitution Party will get the same tiny fraction of the vote it always does. They are irrelevant to the political process.

[Carry_Okie]

The CP, like the JBS, seems to believe (however "unofficially") that the United States has taken over from Israel as the "chosen nation": that the US is a special, unique, chosen nation founded by chr*stians (like Thomas Jefferson, the bible mangler?). This is both Anglo-Israelism and henotheism, two ideologies to which I am adamantly opposed.

Replacement theology is the bankrupt invention of Martin Luther who, after having been rejected by those Jews whose support he was seeking, cooked up totally unsupported teaching in a fit of pique. It was a total misinterpretation of Rav Shaul in both Romans, Corinthians, and Galatians.

Please understand that I am not one of those people who thinks that the First Amendment forbids the states from having official religions of their own.

Your interpretation is both legally and historically correct. I'm all for people instituting rules among them by which they prefer to live as a blessing of liberty... except the Muzzies of course, who have no intention of respecting the rights of those practicing any other religion. By violating that social contract, they are undeserving of its protections.

However, voting for the candidate of an anti-Israel party that has no chance of winning an election in such a crucial year strikes me as not the thing we need to do.

In States like California where there is no chance a Republican would carry the State, voting for the CP candidate is worth more than a wasted vote on a RINO.

[ex-Texan]

Monsanto owns the White House along with BIG OIL. King 0's Food Czar is a former Monsanto insider, Everything is corrupt today. IMPO greedy politicians only want more money . . .

http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docid=6262083407501596844&hl=en&fs=true

[Jewbacca]

“The “Constitution Party” is an anti-Israel John Birch Society/chr*stian dominionist front. When Alan Keyes tried to get their presidential nomination a few years ago they rejected him because he was pro-Israel and anti-terrorism.”

Unfortunate. Is there another option?

[COBOL2Java]

Regardless of who gets the Constitution Party nomination, I know I'm going to be casting my vote for a conservative for President... something I haven't done since... Reagan!

You and me both, Scott.

[ScottinVA]

ZC has been asked to source that assessment and hasn’t yet. It’s completely unsubstantiated.

[libdestroyer]

No, actually the GOP, with its craven unwillingness to challenge the Left head-on, is giving it to them. The conservative departure from the GOP is a result.

Excellent post! I wouldn't add a thing to what you just said.

[Jewbacca]

They do appear to be big fans of Pat Buchanon, who is a complete whack job and anti-semite.

[libdestroyer]

The Constitution Party will get the same tiny fraction of the vote it always does. They are irrelevant to the political process.

I'd rather do what's right than what's relevant.

[libdestroyer]

I for one am glad Martin Luther broke away from the incorrect teachings of the man-led Catholic Church.

[libdestroyer]

I’m in!

I’m going to hold my head up high when I leave the polling place knowing that I voted for conservatism.

Isn’t that the whole point of voting in the first place? It’s not as much about winning as it is VOICING YOUR OPINION.

[Carry_Okie]

I for one am glad Martin Luther broke away from the incorrect teachings of the man-led Catholic Church.

He was right in the respect of papal inerrancy, but he was dead wrong about replacement theology which, ironically, the Roman Church adopted.

[Longbow1969]

I'd rather do what's right than what's relevant.

The Constitution Party is neither relevant or right. We don't need a protectionist trade policy or an isolationist foreign policy. But hey, welcome to the ranks of the .15%!

[ScottinVA]

But I`ll bet they don`t have a Log Cabin branch.

My point is, every political party is going to have some component that doesn`t appeal to everyone. But I like the totality of what the USCP stands for.