Auroras are seen when bursts of charged particles hit Earth's atmosphere -- but there is no record of these occurring at the same time as the 14C increase in tree rings. ©Nasa
1 posted on
06/04/2012 10:58:51 AM PDT by
SunkenCiv
To: SunkenCiv
and scientology myth begins...paging Shirley McCain.
kidding aside....thxs, for the ping. :-)
8 posted on
06/04/2012 11:05:39 AM PDT by
skinkinthegrass
(WA DC E$tabli$hment; DNC/RNC/Unionists...Brazilian saying: "$@me Old $hit; different flie$". :^)
To: SunkenCiv
To: SunkenCiv
To: SunkenCiv
“The radiation burst, which seems to have hit between AD 774 and AD 775”
Were they prototyping the Fukushima Daiichi reactors then?
14 posted on
06/04/2012 11:11:18 AM PDT by
USMCPOP
(Father of LCpl. Karl Linn, KIA 1/26/2005 Al Haqlaniyah, Iraq)
To: SunkenCiv
15 posted on
06/04/2012 11:14:40 AM PDT by
Blogatron
(Brought to you by The American Frog Council; 'Frog - The other green meat')
To: SunkenCiv
Is carbon-14 used for dating ? If so, would such bursts cause skewing in results?
24 posted on
06/04/2012 1:50:08 PM PDT by
Raycpa
To: SunkenCiv
From the NASA website. http://www.nasa.gov/vision/universe/watchtheskies/short_burst.html
Image above: Ground based Observation by W.M. Keck Observatory: The location of the gamma-ray burst as determined by the Swift X-Ray Telescope (XRT) is shown by the blue circle on this infra-red image of the sky from the W.M. Keck telescope. The burst went off in the outskirts of this huge galaxy 2.6 billion lights years away. The location outside, but near, the galaxy fits perfectly with the theory that short bursts are due to black hole formation when orbiting neutron stars collide. The gamma-ray source has not yet been securely identified and scientists are most interested in the 4 objects within Swift's X-ray telescopes error circle. Click on image to enlarge. Credit: Cenko, Soifer, Bian, Desai, Kulkarni (Caltech), Berger (Carnegie), Dey and Jannuzi (NOAO)
26 posted on
06/04/2012 2:25:52 PM PDT by
Sirius Lee
(Goode or Evil, that's the choice.)
To: SunkenCiv
Crab Nebula supernova particles, about 300 years early?
30 posted on
06/04/2012 3:11:44 PM PDT by
rawcatslyentist
("Behold, I am against you, O arrogant one," Jeremiah 50:31)
To: SunkenCiv
32 posted on
06/04/2012 7:31:23 PM PDT by
Graewoulf
((Dictator Baby-Doc Barack's obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND U.S. Constitution.))
To: SunkenCiv
or proton storms from giant solar flares.
Ha ha. Yeah, baby, zeta-pinch aurora. Too bad the one proposed for the late Stone Age/early Bronze Age doesn't have representative tree ring data from 10,000 BC, though it should be possible to see chemical evidence of the huge proton influx in Greenland ice cores.
34 posted on
06/04/2012 9:28:08 PM PDT by
aruanan
To: SunkenCiv
Just over 1,200 years ago, the planet was hit by an extremely intense burst of high-energy radiation of unknown cause ...... The only known events that can produce a 14C spike are floods of γ-rays from supernova explosions or proton storms from giant solar flares. But neither seems likely,
39 posted on
06/05/2012 3:52:54 AM PDT by
Condor51
(Yo Hoffa, so you want to 'take out conservatives'. Well okay Jr - I'm your Huckleberry)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson