Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill Whittle Explains the "Electoral College" Once and for All!
Politichicks ^ | 3-6-12 | patriotupdatereport

Posted on 06/21/2012 7:29:58 PM PDT by ak267

Bill Whittle explains the electoral college versus the national popular vote.

(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: 2012; ec; npv

1 posted on 06/21/2012 7:30:03 PM PDT by ak267
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ak267

The electoral college can disregard the popular vote, if they so desire.


2 posted on 06/21/2012 7:31:22 PM PDT by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just another Joe

Theoretically. But only the most thoroughly reliable democrats and republicans get appointed.


3 posted on 06/21/2012 7:39:32 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Just another Joe

Theoretically, each congressional district elects an elector. This elector is pledged to a candidate. However, the wishes of voters in a district are negated if a plurality of voters statewide vote for a candidate’s electors whom they have not chosen. I feel that the “unit rule” is unconstitutional since it nullifies the idea of “one man, one vote.” If I remember, only two states have apportioned electors (Maine and Nebraska???).


4 posted on 06/21/2012 9:13:31 PM PDT by orchid (Defeat is worse than death, you have to LIVE with defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: orchid
I feel that the “unit rule” is unconstitutional since it nullifies the idea of “one man, one vote.”

Voting - I mean, citizens voting - is not part of the constitutional process for choosing a President, so what you feel about it is irrelevant.

The fact that State legislatures have all specified voting as a means of choosing electors could change tomorrow - and we would be a lot better off if it did.

5 posted on 06/21/2012 9:51:15 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Anna Wintour makes Teresa Heinz Kerry look like Dolly Parton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ak267
There is no national popular vote for President.

There are 51 individual elections for President. Tabulating the aggregate vote is a nonbinding exercise in addition only.

6 posted on 06/21/2012 10:10:37 PM PDT by A.A. Cunningham (Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just another Joe

“The electoral college can disregard the popular vote, if they so desire.”

I do remember reading the reason why in grade school, but, of course, it was actually mentioned in the textbooks then.


7 posted on 06/22/2012 12:33:12 AM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

I’ve had to explain this fact endlessly to liberals, who think that America is a democracy, and not a republic. Without the electoral college, a candidate could win 48 states by 100,000 votes in each state, lose California and New York by 2.5 million votes each, and lose the election by 200,000 votes. Voters in other states would have no voice, as candidates would only focus on a few states. Our founding fathers had great wisdom.


8 posted on 06/22/2012 6:14:36 AM PDT by Freestate316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson