Why I’m Voting for Mitt Romney and Why You Should Too

godfatherpolitics.com ^ | 7/27/2012 | Gary DeMar

[Kevmo]

If you believe Romney is pro-life, I’ve got a bridge to sell you.

The man will say anything to be president. And just like his advisor said, he’ll etch-a-sketch it away when it’s convenient.

[Kevmo]

I am not a Republican; I am a conservative.
***And Free Republic is not a republican website; it is a conservative website.

[smoke n mirrors]

not if,... is over.

Vote BO once more, you’re really done.

[Tennessee Nana]

If your plan does not lead to the ouster of Obama, it is not useful.
__________________________________________

If you really wanted “useful” you wouldnt be pimping Willard...

[Tennessee Nana]

Principles in the voting booth are for children!
________________________________________________

Ever beeen slapped by John Quincy Adams ???

[CatherineofAragon]

"2nd request on this thread :

Who do you guys suggest we vote for as president in 2012?"

I'm coming in late, but since I was pinged, I figure I owe you a response.

Your question has been posed many times to the owner of the site, but I never understood why. No one can tell another how to vote. You have to figure that out for yourself, right? You know the options we have. You can vote for Romney, or, if not, write in a name, or skip to downticket races, or not vote at all. What other options are there?

[Hegewisch Dupa]

Options are for people responsible enough to make tough choices. For too many, this election is instead about an opportunity to broadcast self-sanctimony.

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

And Free Republic is not a republican website; it is a conservative website.

It's the sheer, stony deafness to naked political reality on the part of the shrill scolds of Mittens' online Sister-Wife Squadron that gets to me, in this instance. ;) "Why, yes, we are doubling down on the insult of 2008, by demanding -- DEMANDING!!! -- that you all vote for a candidate roughly as 'conservative' as George McGovern, circa 1972! HOW DARE YOU MISERABLE WRETCHES ACTUALLY REFUSE US -- ?!?"

Jim states it with admirable succinctness, in virtually all of his postings: "We Are The Resistance." ;)

[Kevmo]

If, instead, you cast your vote in accordance with your (imperfectly understood) conservative principles, then you are part of the problem, not part of the solution.
***Why do you come onto a conservative website and harass conservatives to separate them from their conservative beliefs? That is not conservative.

How many conservatives have changed their minds due to your bashing? Maybe 1, if you’re lucky. But for every one that you convince, more than a hundred are dismayed. You’ve caused far more damage to conservatism than your efforts warrant.

I believe that this is exactly what you want, to damage conservatism. Otherwise you’d be operating somewhere else, converting 0bots into mittbots. Instead, you’re here sowing discord among conservatives. All y’all CINOs deserve the zot.

[cynwoody]

Why do you come onto a conservative website and harass conservatives to separate them from their conservative beliefs? That is not conservative.

What's not conservative is to act in a way that makes it more likely Obama will win a second term in which to finish destroying the country. Sewing disunity towards accomplishing that goal is what I would expect from a commie sleeper agent.

[cynwoody]

(Vote for Goode, end up with evil, pat self on back repeatedly)

I like your tag line.

[cynwoody]

Not, therefore, "[my] guy."

He's Sarah Palin's guy. He's Rick Santorum's guy. He's Jim Demint's guy. He's Ron and Rand Paul's guy.

I'm sorry to hear he's not your guy. Not conservative enough? Maybe not enough for you, but he'd get my vote if I were voting in Texas's runoff election next Tuesday! Looks like he might make it.

[Hegewisch Dupa]

Thanks!

[Kevmo]

What’s not conservative is to act in a way that makes it more likely Obama will win a second term in which to finish destroying the country.
***Then why aren’t you going somewhere else converting 0bots into mittbots?

Sewing disunity towards accomplishing that goal is what I would expect from a commie sleeper agent.
***And that is precisely what you are doing. You are a self-accused sleeper agent, due to the fact that you’re sowing discord among conservatives. I don’t understand why JimRob doesn’t zot all you POS CINO cowards.

[Kevmo]

HOW DARE YOU MISERABLE WRETCHES ACTUALLY REFUSE US — ?!?”
***See post above. Now we’re commie sleeper agents.

I really do not understand why JimRob doesn’t just zot these folks whose obvious aim is to damage conservatism. They don’t even deny it.

[cynwoody]

Ever beeen slapped by John Quincy Adams ???

Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost.

Ah, so inspirational! But JQA was never up against anything as evil as Obama.

Before following that advice, consider Hegewisch's tag line.

Voting is a political act to influence a political outcome. Principle comes into play when choosing which political outcome to favor. That choice may well require a distasteful, nose-holding vote. That's the situation we find ourselves in. Unless something truly extraordinary happens in Tampa next month.

[Kevmo]

Do you ever feel like you are in the Twilight Zone, having to defend yourself on a conservative forum for not voting for a liberal?
***Yes. And it felt exactly the same in 2007 with the tootyfruityrudy brigade. Free Republic has been invaded by CINOs.

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

He's Sarah Palin's guy. He's Rick Santorum's guy. He's Jim Demint's guy. He's Ron and Rand Paul's guy.

*Yaaaaawwwwwnnnnnnnnn* "In logic, an argumentum ad populum (Latin for 'appeal to the people') is a fallacious argument that concludes a proposition to be true because many or most people believe it. In other words, the basic idea of the argument is: 'If many believe so, it is so.'"

Troll harder.

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

Then why aren’t you going somewhere else converting 0bots into mittbots?

Again: because attempting to garner votes on behalf of Bishop Mittens isn't even remotely what they're interested in, plainly. (They're hopping up and down and screeching at people who are voting for candidates other than Obama, after all.)

No... no. It's just the trolling they're here for, demonstrably. ;)

[COBOL2Java]

Why do you insist on making our guy fight with one hand tied behind his back?

Because your guy is a loser.