Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I recall those earlier versions of Windows, including
Windows NT and Windows 2000. In fact, I am currently using Windows 2000 Professional on this computer.


3 posted on 08/27/2012 9:47:21 PM PDT by davisfh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: davisfh

Remember that NT 3.1 could fit on a 12MB box! I think the anti-MS morons even called that bloatware back then.

I spent six months on the Win95 development team testing hardware up in Redmond. Worked with an awesome bunch of people and had a lot of fun doing it.

The good old days of the “tech world”. :-)


5 posted on 08/27/2012 10:12:26 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Congrats to Ted Kennedy! He's been sober for two years now!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: davisfh

In fact, I am currently using Windows 2000 Professional on this computer.

As am I.

I prefer the gui and am able to find things (for tweaking system settings, etc.) much easier than XP or anything later.

XP, and the later releases are not so much “operating systems” as they are “media presentation software”.

Problem is Flash and Java have dropped support for W2K, so I’m running the latest versions of both that are still compatible, and get bit often by webpages telling me my Flash is out of date.


11 posted on 08/27/2012 10:55:37 PM PDT by djf (The barbarian hordes will ALWAYS outnumber the clean-shaven. And they vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson