To: uncbob
Would have lost that election regardless of the Bear Stearns collapse. Obama was the fresher and more appealing candidate at the top of the ticket.
15 posted on
08/30/2012 5:40:24 PM PDT by
jb729
To: jb729
Right before the financial mess, McCain was up by 2-3. It would of been close.
19 posted on
08/30/2012 5:48:14 PM PDT by
Kolath
To: jb729
Would have lost that election regardless of the Bear Stearns collapse. Obama was the fresher and more appealing candidate at the top of the ticket.Only if you have an IQ under 80, and actually believe Hope and Change actually has a definite, unique meaning, and worse, and that it never can result in a change for the worse, and much worse.
31 posted on
08/30/2012 6:01:37 PM PDT by
publius911
(Formerly Publius 6961, formerly jennsdad)
To: jb729
Would have lost that election regardless of the Bear Stearns collapse. Obama was the fresher and more appealing candidate at the top of the ticket.Only if you have an IQ under 80, and actually believe Hope and Change actually has a definite, unique meaning, and worse, and that it never can result in a change for the worse, and much worse.
32 posted on
08/30/2012 6:01:47 PM PDT by
publius911
(Formerly Publius 6961, formerly jennsdad)
To: jb729
McCain/Palin were ahead in the polls till the crisis hit
51 posted on
08/31/2012 11:08:06 AM PDT by
uncbob
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson