Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: TigerClaws

IBM licensing software from Microsoft rather than developing their own.


Bingo. IBM probably isn’t on the list for that one because its still doing pretty well.

Microsoft’s failure to see search as an exploitable technology, opening the door for Google, deserves honorable mention too.


10 posted on 10/17/2012 8:54:09 AM PDT by rbg81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: rbg81

Good point re Google.

Time Warner AOL is also up there.


12 posted on 10/17/2012 8:56:56 AM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: rbg81

But Microsoft did or almost did run Netscape out of town.


30 posted on 10/17/2012 9:46:46 AM PDT by ßuddaßudd (>> F U B O << "What the hell kind of country is this if I can only hate a man if he's white?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: rbg81

You can’t really blame companies for not seeing the future. Or you can, but it wouldn’t put them in the pantheon of bad decisions. This is a stupid article, but at least it only blames them for opting out of the obvious. Although, by the time some of these things became obvious maybe it was too late. You can’t turn the Titanic on a dime.

Anyway, had Microsoft jumped into the search engine game earlier maybe it would’ve ended up as Yahoo. We tend to forget that vision isn’t everything. Bill Gates and Steve Jobs were not the only nerds in the 70s to anticipate the PC revolution. Several others made fortunes off it. It’s just that for whatever reason their bets paid off more. We don’t like to admit how much of it is luck, in addition to a billion other factors.


39 posted on 10/17/2012 10:34:06 AM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson