To: daniel1212
I thought this might be about King James being a homosexual.
6 posted on
02/28/2013 5:50:37 PM PST by
allmendream
(Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
To: allmendream; Chode
Yea James already was a Queen so calling this whole thing gay is not a stretch.
25 posted on
03/01/2013 2:52:30 AM PST by
Morgana
(Always a bit of truth in dark humor.)
To: allmendream
The title is certainly an allusion to James’ (alleged) homosexuality.
32 posted on
03/04/2013 6:13:19 AM PST by
Vanders9
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson