Posted on 03/01/2013 7:22:52 AM PST by rktman
Any public official, elected or appointed, who either advocates for or attempts to restrict personal ownership of firearms is a domestic enemy of the Constitution
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
ayep. that oughta do it!
“Any public official, elected or appointed, who either advocates for or attempts to restrict personal ownership of firearms is a domestic enemy of the Constitution”
I agree now what are we going to do with the 45% or so of the politicians who fit that descripton? Pitchforks come to mind.
An outstanding article.
Perhaps the best of all.
What? Just 45%? Is that a result of the sequester? Can’t afford more than 45% to be against the 2nd amendment? LOL! Really thought the number would be over 50% but maybe not. I’m thinkin’ tar and feathers. (Can you say tar anymore or is that one of them there “code” words.) Sorry dang state of affairs.
I was almost afraid to say pitchforks. I find myself self censoring out of fear of the FBI showing up at my door and burning my house down.
Enemy of the what???
Oh, you mean that moldy, old out-dated document sitting in a glass case in Washington somewhere.
Nobody believes in that old thing anymore - just ask any Democrat.
Correction: radical left wing extremist liberal demokkkrat scumbag. (no offense to actual scumbags) And I don’t waste capital letters on them either. They’re not worthy.
“Oh, are you a constitutional scholar?”
“No. But I slept at a Holiday Inn Express last night so that should qualify me. Right? Right? Hello. Anybody out there?”
“Pitchforks come to mind.”
Time for a tar and feather party on the Capitol Steps, and at 1600 PA Ave...before they are tried for treason.
Romanian term limits.
Before the CIVIL WAR...
Dred Scott vs Sanford.
What the SCOTUS thought about gun control in the pre Civil War era.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0060_0393_ZO.html
It would give to persons of the negro race, who were recognised as citizens in any one State of the Union, the right to enter every other State whenever they pleased, singly or in companies, without pass or passport, and without obstruction, to sojourn there as long as they pleased, to go where they pleased at every hour of the day or night without molestation, unless they committed some violation of law for which a white man would be punished;
and it would give them the full liberty of speech in public and in private upon all subjects upon which its own citizens might speak; to hold public meetings upon political affairs,
and to KEEP AND CARRY ARMS wherever they went.
(as you can see, firearm ownership was considered by the SCOTUS to be an INDIVIDUAL right.)
After the CIVIL WAR...
Blacks with guns was so frightning that a new definition was required claiming that the 2nd Ammendment referred to the ORGANIZED MILITIAS only.
LOL!!!
Spot on.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.