Replies

****************************EXCERPT********************************************

Gbees

March 19, 2013 at 6:13 am · Reply

Siliggy, if more CO2 means more cooling does that mean that we’ll see a change of story from our warmists? You know, CAGC (catastrophic anthropogenic global cooling) and see policies to reduce CO2 to avoid freezing?

11 posted on 03/20/2013 8:59:44 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ((The Global Warming Hoax was a Criminal Act....where is Al Gore?))

More..... something of a bit of skeptical question:

**********************************EXCERPT***********************************

DavidH

March 19, 2013 at 7:27 am · Reply

I’m going to nit-pick and point out that 3.5 billion years is extraordinarily old for oceanic crust. Wikipedia says typically 200 million years … OK, I know it’s not always a reliable source but I’ve read the same number in various books. Oceanic crust is continuously “recycled” by subduction in the course of tectonic plate activity so it’s on average way younger than continental crust. If this bit of oceanic basalt was so old, it’s not typical of most oceanic basalt. Does the study extrapolate from this to most or all the ocean crust and if, so how do they justify it?

Before anyone gets the wrong idea, no I’m not a warmist troll. Just taking a sceptical look at the information given.

14 posted on 03/20/2013 9:05:05 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ((The Global Warming Hoax was a Criminal Act....where is Al Gore?))

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794