Indication of anomalous heat energy production in a reactor device

Arxiv.org ^ | Submitted on 16 May 2013 | Giuseppe Levi, Evelyn Foschi, Torbjörn Hartman, Bo Höistad, Roland Pettersson, Lars Tegnér, Hanno Es

[count-your-change]

Another question is who was running this test before the author showed up? How was it started? What is the range of emissivity of the cylinder?

[Kevmo]

And yet, they publish this independent report today.

Thanks 4 Bumping The Thread T4BTT

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2965392/posts?page=19#19

[Toddsterpatriot]

Dogbert cuts right to the chase.

[Toddsterpatriot]

the result is still one order of magnitude greater than conventional energy sources.

Unless they use dilute H2O2.

[Kevmo]

And the scientists don’t test for that. Gosh, as pedestrian as I am, I would have tested for it.

How to Prove that the Rossi/Focardi eCAT LENR is Real (or Fake)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2730401/posts

[from occupied ga]

I’ve noticed that the dumber the idea the quicker the jackasses of fr who believe in it are to dive in with the first insult. Like I said put your money where your big keyboard brave mouth is and have the last laugh or not as is most likely the case. Cold fusion is like he pill you added to the water that you filled your gas tank wih in the ‘50s. “for the true believer no proof is necessary and no disproof possible” Stuart Chase

[MHGinTN]

Nice try, but you’re still in the juvenile range, not rising to the level of series. Try again. Shirley you can rise above punk level. Give it a hugh try, little one.

[Kevmo]

Like I said put your money where your big keyboard brave mouth is

***How I Made Money from Cold Fusion
Saturday, January 23, 2010 12:28:49 PM · by Kevmo · 28 replies · 1,013+ views
Exclusive Article for Free Republic | 1/23/10 | Kevmo
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2435697/posts

[Kevmo]

dilute H2O2 cannot account for the energy densities reported in this independent report

[from occupied ga]

zzzz

[MHGinTN]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pd413R24RA

[Wonder Warthog]

"But what needs to be measured is heat production, which is not the same thing."

True. But measurement of temperature is the key that allows the calculation of heat production. This is a very simple convection-cooled system. I suspect there are dozens of math models that will let you plug in a size and shape being cooled, and its known temperature, and have it cough out a pretty good measure of heat production.

[Wonder Warthog]

"Unless they use dilute H2O2."

You keep repeating that. Unfortunately, it isn't true. To yield the needed energy, the H2O2 would need to be very concentrated and would very likely signal its presence by offgassing oxygen (hydrogen peroxide decomposition is catalyzed by MANY metals).

[Kevmo]

Isn’t it possible to work backwards from the data presented to generate heat production from measurement of temperature over time at 1Hz?

[Normandy]

I think that’s a significant statement.

[Kevmo]

I predict crickets in your future.

[Kevmo]

Thanks 4 Bumping The Thread T4BTT

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2965392/posts?page=19#19

[from occupied ga]

you’re boring

[MHGinTN]

Bwahahahaha ... you don’t even know the main players in the decde or more long controversy, yet you pretend to be so expert that you can ridicule those who’ve kept up. LOL I sure am an old boring freeper. BTW, try not to insult FR when you try to be adult.

[Kevmo]

Unless they use dilute H2O2.
***H2O2... sounds chemical. From the article:

Computed volumetric and gravimetric energy densities were found to be far above those of any known chemical source. Even by the most conservative assumptions as to the errors in the measurements, the result is still one order of magnitude greater than conventional energy sources.