So this is your contribution to a scientific thread — derision? How does that further scientific knowledge? It doesn’t. How is it that the PTBs say that such behavior doesn’t qualify as anti-science?
Here’s the basics: A Freeper logs onto a thread, talks about some scientific aspect of it, and tries to further the knowledge available. A different freeper logs onto the same thread and spreads insults, derision, and stuff that comes out the back end of a bull. Which of these 2 freepers is legitimately pro-science? Which one is Anti-science?
Are you jokers here to deride other Freepers’ comments or to further scientific knowledge?
There's nothing scientific about hyping a scam.
I guess I could be “more scientific” and enlist Mann, Jones, Hansen and Gore to come to your rescue. They are especially expert at creating conclusions without facts or data to back them up .... sort of like the snake oil salesmen of days long ago.
I enjoy reading the articles and commentary, but I'm likely to crack wise when I post, so usually I don't. Doesn't mean I find the work amusing or worthy of derision, I just don't have much of value to add. And I chuckled a bit at the comments by those other guys. Sorry 'bout that.
If there were anything scientific to discuss, I'd be all over it. "Cold fusion" or "LENR" (whatever you want to call it) is a total scam. Everything about Andrea Rossi screams, "Con man!" And I have suspicions about why you keep posting about an obvious scam. I'm not a gambler, so I don't know how one profits from betting. But I suspect that your constantly posting about this scam is an effort to keep the betting on E-Cat alive over there at E-Trade.
Betting on E-Cat isn't the same as investing in a concept that you believe has real potential. Have you given money to Andrea Rossi or one of his fake corporations yet? Have you placed down payment on an E-Cat yet?