[discostu]

It’s not a personal attack, I CAUGHT YOU LYING, it’s a statement of fact. You say patent office won’t patent LENR, they have
http://www.google.com/patents?id=WhIgAgAAEBAJ&pg=PA1&lpg=PA1&dq=%22Low+Energy+Nuclear+Reaction%22&source=bl&ots=Xuf1yRH2vB&sig=142QFcoB_2WmhjeCiLVn9AuUGlU&hl=en&sa=X&ei=qEROUKH4JsjSrQHKmIGoBw&ved=0CD4Q6AEwBQ&goback=.gde_4132340_member_161859049#v=onepage&q&f=false
you know that, you said it anyway, you lied. People who lie are known as liars. No personal attack, statement of simple proven fact.

[Kevmo]

personal attack

Thanks 4 Bumping The Thread T4BTT.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2965392/posts?page=19#19

[Wonder Warthog]

"It’s not a personal attack, I CAUGHT YOU LYING, it’s a statement of fact."

Actually not. The stated policy of the Patent Office is to automatically reject applications about "cold fusion" as being in the same category as "perpetual motion". There have been a very few people who have managed to sneak things past the gates by proper selection of weasel-wordy terminology.

So yes, there have been patents granted about the topic area of "cold fusion", but called something else. In the case of your specific reference, this is about "Dislocation Site Formation Techniques", though the substance of the patent is all about "cold fusion".