Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nevada Becomes the 5th Western State to Explore the Transfer of Public Lands
American Legislator ^ | June 6, 2013 | Todd Wynn

Posted on 06/07/2013 12:57:58 PM PDT by ThethoughtsofGreg

On June 4, 2013, Governor Brian Sandoval signed into law AB227—“Nevada Land Management Implementation Committee”—making Nevada the fifth western state to actively explore the transfer of public lands to western states. AB227 creates the Nevada Land Management Task Force, which will conduct a study addressing the transfer of public lands in the state.

This movement advocating for the transfer of western public lands began in Utah in 2012.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanlegislator.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: environment; green; nevada; publicland
Why do they feds still control all of this?
1 posted on 06/07/2013 12:57:58 PM PDT by ThethoughtsofGreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ThethoughtsofGreg

They need space to figure out how to run the UFOs.


2 posted on 06/07/2013 12:58:46 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There's no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThethoughtsofGreg

I think the feds control around 87% of Nevada.


3 posted on 06/07/2013 1:00:59 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThethoughtsofGreg
Why do they feds still control all of this?

Because they own it. All the land from the Louisiana Purchase and the Alaska purchase and the Gadsden Purchase and all the land captured from Spain belonged to the U.S. Who else would it belong to? When states were created the feds deeded some, but not all land to them. Other land was acquired by individuals through farm homesteads and the like. The remainder belongs to the feds. If Nevada wants to control all that land then I'm sure Congress would quote them a very nice price.

4 posted on 06/07/2013 1:09:27 PM PDT by 0.E.O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThethoughtsofGreg

Hasn’t it already be used as collateral for loans from China?


5 posted on 06/07/2013 1:12:02 PM PDT by informavoracious (We're being "punished" with Stanley Ann's baby. Obamacare: shovel-ready healthcare.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 0.E.O
To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings

I don't see where that authorizes the Federal government to own anything more than listed.

/johnny

6 posted on 06/07/2013 1:14:18 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

You would be surprised how much the Feds control Nevada and what’s there.


7 posted on 06/07/2013 1:30:12 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ThethoughtsofGreg

They need room for their data storage facilities...


8 posted on 06/07/2013 1:30:53 PM PDT by redhead (NO GROUND TO THE DEVIL! Use Weaponized Prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 0.E.O

You have it backwards, especially in the case of Nevada.

When Nevada was formed, the state (and the landowners) were given the opportunity to claim lands they wanted. The state could have claimed much more than they did.

They claimed (typically) only the riparian areas - which you can see looking at a land ownership map of the state. You see pretty solid private ownership from Reno down to Minden, Smith Valley and Yerington... and some in Vegas (which used to have natural springs where the east end of The Strip now is), and in the Elko/Wells area.

The feds took the lands that no one claimed.

When the UPRR was built, the US Government gave every other section for 10 miles on either side of the RR tracks to the UPRR as compensation for building the RR.

Other states in the west, which came into the union later than Nevada, got much smarter about this, and claimed many sections of land for state use, even if all they did was lease them out for grazing.

The entire way that Nevada entered the Union was a rush-rush issue, and there were many in Carson City who had, as their entire focus, the silver mines of Virginia City, a little farming on the west side of the state... and jack-all else.


9 posted on 06/07/2013 1:33:54 PM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NVDave

As I recall from my Nevada History course at UNR, the state entered into the Union during the civil war because of the silver mines in Virginia City which the North desperately needed, hence the state motto: Battle Born

As I recall, a condition of statehood was the transfer of all lands not being utilized to the Fed.

I have NEVER considered the federal gov as “owning” the land, but rather as managing the land. They own jack!

All federally managed lands should be returned to the states except those lands defined in the US Constitution.


10 posted on 06/07/2013 1:44:39 PM PDT by Cuttnhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
I don't see where that authorizes the Federal government to own anything more than listed.

Article IV, Section III: "The Congress shall have power to dispose of and make all needful rules and regulations respecting the territory or other property belonging to the United States; and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to prejudice any claims of the United States, or of any particular state."

11 posted on 06/07/2013 1:49:27 PM PDT by 0.E.O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ThethoughtsofGreg

The Democrats won’t give it to the States. They need it to give back to Mexico for reparations as part of our inevitable apology for winning the Mexican-American War.


12 posted on 06/07/2013 3:02:33 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kaehurowing

...as part of our inevitable apology for winning the Mexican-American War.

**
And as part of our apology to the corrupt, dysfunctional Mexico, for building our stable and vibrant economy and a decent society, with political power that is not rife with corruption, where officials act according to duty and not for bribes. Well, at least, that is what we used to have.


13 posted on 06/07/2013 3:24:07 PM PDT by Bigg Red (Restore us, O God of hosts; let your face shine, that we may be saved! -Ps80)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson